Homeschool Guide: These lesson plans are a guide for parents. Content may contain errors — always cross-reference with official exam board specifications.

L1: Source Analysis Classical

FoundationHigherAll Boards

4 detailed 50-minute lessons with teaching scripts, worked examples, parent guides, and assessment criteria.

Fastmail

Lesson Overview

Total Lessons: 4
Tier: Foundation and Higher
Duration: 50 minutes per lesson (200 minutes total)
Exam Boards: OCR

Learning Objectives

Prerequisites

Materials & Equipment

Lesson 1: Introduction: Source Analysis Classical

Duration: 50 minutes

Starter Activity (5 minutes)

Quick Recall

3 quick questions to activate prior knowledge about source analysis classical. Use mini-whiteboard or paper.

Main Content (35 minutes)

Parent/Teacher Guide:
Before lesson: Read script below. Prepare materials. Pre-teach key vocab: L1.
If stuck: See Troubleshooting below. Break into smaller steps.
Extension: See Stretch & Challenge section.
Teaching Script (35 mins):
Mins 0-5 - Hook: "Today: Source Analysis Classical. Goal: by the end you can ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content, using the method shown step by step. Connects to the previous lesson in this unit because you'll reuse its method throughout today's work."
Mins 5-15 - Direct Instruction: 1) Define: "Source Analysis Classical is..." 2) Key principle: "Most important:..." 3) Draw diagram, label live. 4) Real example: "Like ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content - a real example worked through in full..."
Mins 15-25 - Guided Practice: Ex1: Teacher models. Ex2: Student tries with guidance. Ex3: Student independent.
Mins 25-35 - Independent Practice: 3-5 questions. Immediate feedback.
Worked Example 1: Basic

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  1. What is asked? Explain
  2. Recall knowledge:
  3. Apply: ✗ Only summarising what a source shows without analysing ✓ Description alone earns few marks — evaluate provenance, purpose and usefulness ✗ Treating literary sources as factual accounts ✓ Homer's epics are poetry, not history — composed to entertain and explore themes
  4. Check: Check the units named in the question and sense-check the size of your answer.
  5. Answer: State the complete final answer.

Tip: "Show working - method marks > answer marks."

Worked Example 2: Multi-step

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  1. Break down: Separate parts?
  2. Solve each: ✗ Only summarising what a source shows without analysing ✓ Description alone earns few marks — evaluate provenance, purpose and usefulness ✗ Treating literary sources as factual accounts ✓ Homer's epics are poetry, not history — composed to entertain and explore themes
  3. Combine: The parts chain: each answer feeds the next step of the question.
  4. Final answer: Evidence cited from the lesson content.
Worked Example 3: Data/Application

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  1. Read data: Axes, units, scale
  2. Patterns: Trends, anomalies
  3. Explain: Why? Using source analysis classical
  4. Conclude: Evidence-based

Common Questions & Troubleshooting

Q: "Why does work this way?"
A: Analogy: "✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content". Try re-draw or re-write the worked example from memory, then check it against the model answer.
Q: "Wrong answers on calculations."
A: Checklist: units? formula? calculator mode? sig figs?
Q: "Can't remember key terms."
A: Flashcards (term front, def+diagram back). Spaced repetition: day 1, 3, 7.
Q: "Exam wording confuses me."
A: Commands: Describe=what you see; Explain=reasons; Evaluate=pros/cons+judgement; Calculate=working+units.
Q: "Running out of time."
A: 1 mark/min. Skip hard, return. Attempt all - partial marks count.

Assessment & Model Answers

Mastery Checklist:
  • [ ] Define Source Analysis Classical in own words
  • [ ] Identify features in diagram
  • [ ] Explain process step-by-step
  • [ ] Apply to unfamiliar context
  • [ ] Score 80%+ on past paper question

Model Answer: Past Paper Question

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  • 1 mark: [Key terminology]
  • 1 mark: [Mechanism/process]
  • 1 mark: [Application/example]
  • 1 mark: [Evaluation - Higher]

Model response: "[Complete answer with expected detail/terminology]"

Why full marks: [What makes this strong]

Stretch & Challenge (Grade 8-9):
  • Synoptic links: Connect to paper-2-homeric-world / the next lesson
  • Real-world: Research use in industry, medicine or research
  • Advanced calc: Try a more challenging variant
  • Critical: "Evaluate limitations of today's model"
  • Research: Recent discovery on source analysis classical, summarise 100 words

Plenary (5 mins)

Label the Diagram

Unlabelled diagram - write all parts in 1 min

Assessment Criteria

Lesson 2: Core Concepts: Source Analysis Classical

Duration: 50 minutes

Starter Activity (5 minutes)

Review Previous Lesson

Quick recap: write 3 key points from last lesson on source analysis classical. Use mini-whiteboard or paper.

Main Content (35 minutes)

Parent/Teacher Guide:
Before lesson: Read script below. Prepare materials. Pre-teach key vocab: L1.
If stuck: See Troubleshooting below. Break into smaller steps.
Extension: See Stretch & Challenge section.
Teaching Script (35 mins):
Mins 0-5 - Hook: "Today: Source Analysis Classical. Goal: by the end you can ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content, using the method shown step by step. Connects to the previous lesson in this unit because you'll reuse its method throughout today's work."
Mins 5-15 - Direct Instruction: 1) Define: "Source Analysis Classical is..." 2) Key principle: "Most important:..." 3) Draw diagram, label live. 4) Real example: "Like ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content - a real example worked through in full..."
Mins 15-25 - Guided Practice: Ex1: Teacher models. Ex2: Student tries with guidance. Ex3: Student independent.
Mins 25-35 - Independent Practice: 3-5 questions. Immediate feedback.
Worked Example 1: Basic

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  1. What is asked? Explain
  2. Recall knowledge:
  3. Apply: ✗ Only summarising what a source shows without analysing ✓ Description alone earns few marks — evaluate provenance, purpose and usefulness ✗ Treating literary sources as factual accounts ✓ Homer's epics are poetry, not history — composed to entertain and explore themes
  4. Check: Check the units named in the question and sense-check the size of your answer.
  5. Answer: State the complete final answer.

Tip: "Show working - method marks > answer marks."

Worked Example 2: Multi-step

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  1. Break down: Separate parts?
  2. Solve each: ✗ Only summarising what a source shows without analysing ✓ Description alone earns few marks — evaluate provenance, purpose and usefulness ✗ Treating literary sources as factual accounts ✓ Homer's epics are poetry, not history — composed to entertain and explore themes
  3. Combine: The parts chain: each answer feeds the next step of the question.
  4. Final answer: Evidence cited from the lesson content.
Worked Example 3: Data/Application

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  1. Read data: Axes, units, scale
  2. Patterns: Trends, anomalies
  3. Explain: Why? Using source analysis classical
  4. Conclude: Evidence-based

Common Questions & Troubleshooting

Q: "Why does work this way?"
A: Analogy: "✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content". Try re-draw or re-write the worked example from memory, then check it against the model answer.
Q: "Wrong answers on calculations."
A: Checklist: units? formula? calculator mode? sig figs?
Q: "Can't remember key terms."
A: Flashcards (term front, def+diagram back). Spaced repetition: day 1, 3, 7.
Q: "Exam wording confuses me."
A: Commands: Describe=what you see; Explain=reasons; Evaluate=pros/cons+judgement; Calculate=working+units.
Q: "Running out of time."
A: 1 mark/min. Skip hard, return. Attempt all - partial marks count.

Assessment & Model Answers

Mastery Checklist:
  • [ ] Define Source Analysis Classical in own words
  • [ ] Identify features in diagram
  • [ ] Explain process step-by-step
  • [ ] Apply to unfamiliar context
  • [ ] Score 80%+ on past paper question

Model Answer: Past Paper Question

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  • 1 mark: [Key terminology]
  • 1 mark: [Mechanism/process]
  • 1 mark: [Application/example]
  • 1 mark: [Evaluation - Higher]

Model response: "[Complete answer with expected detail/terminology]"

Why full marks: [What makes this strong]

Stretch & Challenge (Grade 8-9):
  • Synoptic links: Connect to paper-2-homeric-world / the next lesson
  • Real-world: Research use in industry, medicine or research
  • Advanced calc: Try a more challenging variant
  • Critical: "Evaluate limitations of today's model"
  • Research: Recent discovery on source analysis classical, summarise 100 words

Plenary (5 mins)

Label the Diagram

Unlabelled diagram - write all parts in 1 min

Assessment Criteria

Lesson 3: Application: Source Analysis Classical

Duration: 50 minutes

Starter Activity (5 minutes)

Review Previous Lesson

Quick recap: write 3 key points from last lesson on source analysis classical. Use mini-whiteboard or paper.

Main Content (35 minutes)

Parent/Teacher Guide:
Before lesson: Read script below. Prepare materials. Pre-teach key vocab: L1.
If stuck: See Troubleshooting below. Break into smaller steps.
Extension: See Stretch & Challenge section.
Teaching Script (35 mins):
Mins 0-5 - Hook: "Today: Source Analysis Classical. Goal: by the end you can ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content, using the method shown step by step. Connects to the previous lesson in this unit because you'll reuse its method throughout today's work."
Mins 5-15 - Direct Instruction: 1) Define: "Source Analysis Classical is..." 2) Key principle: "Most important:..." 3) Draw diagram, label live. 4) Real example: "Like ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content - a real example worked through in full..."
Mins 15-25 - Guided Practice: Ex1: Teacher models. Ex2: Student tries with guidance. Ex3: Student independent.
Mins 25-35 - Independent Practice: 3-5 questions. Immediate feedback.
Worked Example 1: Basic

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  1. What is asked? Explain
  2. Recall knowledge:
  3. Apply: ✗ Only summarising what a source shows without analysing ✓ Description alone earns few marks — evaluate provenance, purpose and usefulness ✗ Treating literary sources as factual accounts ✓ Homer's epics are poetry, not history — composed to entertain and explore themes
  4. Check: Check the units named in the question and sense-check the size of your answer.
  5. Answer: State the complete final answer.

Tip: "Show working - method marks > answer marks."

Worked Example 2: Multi-step

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  1. Break down: Separate parts?
  2. Solve each: ✗ Only summarising what a source shows without analysing ✓ Description alone earns few marks — evaluate provenance, purpose and usefulness ✗ Treating literary sources as factual accounts ✓ Homer's epics are poetry, not history — composed to entertain and explore themes
  3. Combine: The parts chain: each answer feeds the next step of the question.
  4. Final answer: Evidence cited from the lesson content.
Worked Example 3: Data/Application

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  1. Read data: Axes, units, scale
  2. Patterns: Trends, anomalies
  3. Explain: Why? Using source analysis classical
  4. Conclude: Evidence-based

Common Questions & Troubleshooting

Q: "Why does work this way?"
A: Analogy: "✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content". Try re-draw or re-write the worked example from memory, then check it against the model answer.
Q: "Wrong answers on calculations."
A: Checklist: units? formula? calculator mode? sig figs?
Q: "Can't remember key terms."
A: Flashcards (term front, def+diagram back). Spaced repetition: day 1, 3, 7.
Q: "Exam wording confuses me."
A: Commands: Describe=what you see; Explain=reasons; Evaluate=pros/cons+judgement; Calculate=working+units.
Q: "Running out of time."
A: 1 mark/min. Skip hard, return. Attempt all - partial marks count.

Assessment & Model Answers

Mastery Checklist:
  • [ ] Define Source Analysis Classical in own words
  • [ ] Identify features in diagram
  • [ ] Explain process step-by-step
  • [ ] Apply to unfamiliar context
  • [ ] Score 80%+ on past paper question

Model Answer: Past Paper Question

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  • 1 mark: [Key terminology]
  • 1 mark: [Mechanism/process]
  • 1 mark: [Application/example]
  • 1 mark: [Evaluation - Higher]

Model response: "[Complete answer with expected detail/terminology]"

Why full marks: [What makes this strong]

Stretch & Challenge (Grade 8-9):
  • Synoptic links: Connect to paper-2-homeric-world / the next lesson
  • Real-world: Research use in industry, medicine or research
  • Advanced calc: Try a more challenging variant
  • Critical: "Evaluate limitations of today's model"
  • Research: Recent discovery on source analysis classical, summarise 100 words

Plenary (5 mins)

Exam Question Speed Round

5 quick questions, 1 min each. Mark together.

Assessment Criteria

Lesson 4: Exam Practice: Source Analysis Classical

Duration: 50 minutes

Starter Activity (5 minutes)

Review Previous Lesson

Quick recap: write 3 key points from last lesson on source analysis classical. Use mini-whiteboard or paper.

Main Content (35 minutes)

Parent/Teacher Guide:
Before lesson: Read script below. Prepare materials. Pre-teach key vocab: L1.
If stuck: See Troubleshooting below. Break into smaller steps.
Extension: See Stretch & Challenge section.
Teaching Script (35 mins):
Mins 0-5 - Hook: "Today: Source Analysis Classical. Goal: by the end you can ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content, using the method shown step by step. Connects to the previous lesson in this unit because you'll reuse its method throughout today's work."
Mins 5-15 - Direct Instruction: 1) Define: "Source Analysis Classical is..." 2) Key principle: "Most important:..." 3) Draw diagram, label live. 4) Real example: "Like ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content - a real example worked through in full..."
Mins 15-25 - Guided Practice: Ex1: Teacher models. Ex2: Student tries with guidance. Ex3: Student independent.
Mins 25-35 - Independent Practice: 3-5 questions. Immediate feedback.
Worked Example 1: Basic

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  1. What is asked? Explain
  2. Recall knowledge:
  3. Apply: ✗ Only summarising what a source shows without analysing ✓ Description alone earns few marks — evaluate provenance, purpose and usefulness ✗ Treating literary sources as factual accounts ✓ Homer's epics are poetry, not history — composed to entertain and explore themes
  4. Check: Check the units named in the question and sense-check the size of your answer.
  5. Answer: State the complete final answer.

Tip: "Show working - method marks > answer marks."

Worked Example 2: Multi-step

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  1. Break down: Separate parts?
  2. Solve each: ✗ Only summarising what a source shows without analysing ✓ Description alone earns few marks — evaluate provenance, purpose and usefulness ✗ Treating literary sources as factual accounts ✓ Homer's epics are poetry, not history — composed to entertain and explore themes
  3. Combine: The parts chain: each answer feeds the next step of the question.
  4. Final answer: Evidence cited from the lesson content.
Worked Example 3: Data/Application

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  1. Read data: Axes, units, scale
  2. Patterns: Trends, anomalies
  3. Explain: Why? Using source analysis classical
  4. Conclude: Evidence-based

Common Questions & Troubleshooting

Q: "Why does work this way?"
A: Analogy: "✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content". Try re-draw or re-write the worked example from memory, then check it against the model answer.
Q: "Wrong answers on calculations."
A: Checklist: units? formula? calculator mode? sig figs?
Q: "Can't remember key terms."
A: Flashcards (term front, def+diagram back). Spaced repetition: day 1, 3, 7.
Q: "Exam wording confuses me."
A: Commands: Describe=what you see; Explain=reasons; Evaluate=pros/cons+judgement; Calculate=working+units.
Q: "Running out of time."
A: 1 mark/min. Skip hard, return. Attempt all - partial marks count.

Assessment & Model Answers

Mastery Checklist:
  • [ ] Define Source Analysis Classical in own words
  • [ ] Identify features in diagram
  • [ ] Explain process step-by-step
  • [ ] Apply to unfamiliar context
  • [ ] Score 80%+ on past paper question

Model Answer: Past Paper Question

Q: ✗ Saying a source is reliable/unreliable without explaining why ✓ Justify your judgement with specific evidence from provenance and content

  • 1 mark: [Key terminology]
  • 1 mark: [Mechanism/process]
  • 1 mark: [Application/example]
  • 1 mark: [Evaluation - Higher]

Model response: "[Complete answer with expected detail/terminology]"

Why full marks: [What makes this strong]

Stretch & Challenge (Grade 8-9):
  • Synoptic links: Connect to paper-2-homeric-world / the next lesson
  • Real-world: Research use in industry, medicine or research
  • Advanced calc: Try a more challenging variant
  • Critical: "Evaluate limitations of today's model"
  • Research: Recent discovery on source analysis classical, summarise 100 words

Plenary (5 mins)

Exam Question Speed Round

5 quick questions, 1 min each. Mark together.

Assessment Criteria

📝 Mark Scheme Guidance

How examiners mark L1: Read the command word carefully — State = one word/phrase (1 mark), Describe = pattern or detail (2 marks), Explain = reason with "because" (2–3 marks), Compare = similarities AND differences, Evaluate = both sides + conclusion. Method marks are awarded for correct working even if the final answer is wrong. Always show your working — unexplained answers score zero for AO2.

Success on L1 questions: Underline the command word, count the marks (one mark per point expected), and answer in the format the command word demands.

Board Notes & Revision Links

This lesson is examined by: OCR J199. Tier and paper details vary - always check your board's current specification.

Follow-up revision: source-analysis-classical on GCSE Revise (notes, flashcards and auto-graded target tests for this exact topic).

Homework & Consolidation

Recommended Resources

🎓 Smart Lesson (Guided)