G43: Fieldwork: Enquiry Process
The geographical enquiry process: formulating questions and hypotheses, selecting appropriate evidence, identifying suitable locations, and carrying out risk assessment.
The geographical enquiry process: formulating questions and hypotheses, selecting appropriate evidence, identifying suitable locations, and carrying out risk assessment.
Typical topics include: river characteristics (width, depth, velocity, bedload), coastal processes (erosion, longshore drift, sediment size), and weather/microclimate. Example: "How does the cross-profile of the River X change downstream?"
Typical topics include: urban land use changes, quality of the built environment, tourism impacts, retail sphere of influence, and environmental quality. Example: "Does environmental quality decrease from the CBD outwards in Town Y?"
Good research questions are:
Physical: "River velocity increases with distance downstream" - based on the Bradshaw Model which predicts that velocity, width, depth, and discharge all increase downstream as more tributaries join and the channel becomes more efficient.
Human: "Environmental quality decreases with distance from the CBD" - based on urban models which suggest that the inner city has older, more degraded housing and less investment than the city centre.
Coastal: "Sediment size decreases with distance along the beach in the direction of longshore drift" - based on the theory that attrition rounds and reduces sediment as it is transported.
A null hypothesis states there is no relationship or difference (e.g. "There is no significant relationship between distance downstream and river velocity"). Statistical tests like Spearman's Rank work on the null hypothesis - if the result is significant, you reject the null hypothesis.
| Hypothesis | Primary Data Needed | Secondary Data Needed |
|---|---|---|
| River velocity increases downstream | Velocity measurements (flow meter), width, depth at multiple sites | OS map for site distances, Environment Agency flow data |
| Environmental quality decreases from the CBD | Environmental quality surveys, photo evidence, litter counts | Census data, deprivation indices, historic maps |
| Sediment size decreases along longshore drift | Sediment size measurements at intervals along the beach | Geology maps, coastal management maps, historic erosion data |
| Urban land use changes with distance from the CBD | Land use surveys, building age classification, rental prices | Google Earth imagery, census data, local authority plans |
The sample must be large enough to be representative but practical to collect:
| Factor | Considerations |
|---|---|
| Accessibility | Can you reach the site safely? Is there road access or public transport? Is the terrain manageable for all group members? |
| Safety | Are there hazards (fast-flowing water, steep cliffs, busy roads)? Is the site away from dangerous areas? |
| Relevance | Does the site show the geographical process you are studying? Does it have enough variation to test your hypothesis? |
| Scale | Is the area manageable in the time available? Can you collect enough data at different points? |
| Representation | Is the site typical of the area, or is it unusual? Unusual sites may give misleading results |
| Permission | Do you need landowner consent? Are there access restrictions (nature reserves, private land)? |
For a river study testing the Bradshaw Model, you need sites from the source to the mouth. Choose 8-10 sites along the river's course, spaced roughly equally apart. Use an OS map to identify safe access points (footpaths, bridges, public rights of way). Avoid sites near weirs, deep water, or steep banks. Mark each site with a grid reference. Consider how far the group can walk in the time available.
| Environment | Hazard | Risk Level | Prevention/Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| River | Drowning / deep water | High | Never enter water above knee height; wear buoyancy aids; work in pairs; avoid sites near weirs |
| River | Slippery banks | Medium | Wear appropriate footwear (wellingtons/gripping boots); avoid steep banks; use walking aids |
| River | Weil's disease (bacteria in water) | Medium | Cover cuts with waterproof plasters; wash hands before eating; avoid swallowing river water |
| Coastal | Rising tide / being cut off | High | Check tide times; identify escape routes; set a turnaround time; never work below cliffs |
| Coastal | Falling rocks / cliff collapse | High | Stay away from cliff base; wear hard hats near cliffs; check for warning signs |
| Urban | Traffic | Medium | Work on pavements; use pedestrian crossings; wear high-visibility vests; brief on road safety |
| Urban | Personal safety / harassment | Medium | Work in groups of 3+; stay in public areas; carry a mobile phone; have a meeting point |
| All | Extreme weather | Medium | Check forecast; wear appropriate clothing; have a wet-weather alternative plan; carry first aid kit |
Q1: Explain the difference between a research question and a hypothesis.
Q2: Write a suitable hypothesis for a study investigating how river characteristics change downstream.
Q3: Describe three factors you would consider when choosing a fieldwork location.
Q4: Identify two hazards of river fieldwork and explain how you would minimise the risk from each.
Q5: Explain why it is important to use both primary and secondary data in a geographical enquiry.
Students often write vague answers without specific geographical evidence. Wrong: Writing generalised statements like 'it causes problems' Correct: Using specific data and named examples, e.g. 'the 2010 Haiti earthquake killed over 200,000 people due to poor building quality'
Students often confuse causes and effects. Wrong: Mixing up what caused the event with what resulted from it Correct: Clearly separate causes (why it happened) from effects (what happened as a result)
Students often describe rather than evaluate. Wrong: Listing strategies without assessing their effectiveness Correct: Weighing up strengths and weaknesses of each approach and reaching a supported judgement
6 marks: Explain the key factors affecting fieldwork: enquiry process.
Fieldwork: Enquiry Process involves multiple interconnected factors that geographers must understand. The key concepts include the processes that create and change fieldwork: enquiry process, the impacts on both people and environment, and the strategies used to manage associated challenges. For a comprehensive answer, specific case study evidence should be used throughout, with named examples and data to support each point. Geographical terminology should be used precisely, and the interrelationship between physical and human factors should be demonstrated. Top-level responses evaluate the relative importance of different factors and consider how the situation varies between locations.
Mark scheme: 2 marks for identifying key factors, 2 marks for explaining processes with detail, 2 marks for using specific evidence
AO1 requires knowledge of the key facts and processes related to fieldwork: enquiry process. AO2 demands understanding of how and why these processes operate, and their implications. AO3 asks you to analyse, evaluate and make judgements — this is where grade 9 answers stand out by weighing up competing perspectives and reaching supported conclusions. AO4 may involve interpreting maps, graphs or data related to this topic. To move from grade 5 to grade 9: use precise geographical terminology, support every point with specific case study evidence, and always evaluate rather than just describe.
Get the best revision books and guides to boost your grades.