GCSE Revision Aid: This resource is designed to support your revision and may contain errors. If you find a discrepancy with your class teaching, your teacher is correct — please let us know at gcserevise@scott.scottrix.co.uk.

H30: The Problem of the Poor

Foundation Higher AQAEdexcelOCREduqasCCEA

Why poverty increased in Elizabethan England, the distinction between the deserving and undeserving poor, and how the government responded through legislation from 1572 to 1601.

Fastmail

📖 The Scale of Poverty

Key Context: Poverty was one of the most serious problems in Elizabethan England. The population grew from approximately 3 million in 1550 to over 4 million by 1600, but the economy could not provide enough work or food for everyone. The dissolution of the monasteries (1536-41) had destroyed the main system of charitable support for the poor, and economic changes left increasing numbers of people destitute. The government was forced to create new legislation to deal with the crisis.

Evidence of Growing Poverty

Example: The Harvest Crisis of 1594-97

A series of terrible harvests from 1594 to 1597 caused severe food shortages and price increases. The price of wheat rose by approximately 90% between 1594 and 1597. In some areas, the poor were reduced to eating dogs, cats, and even grass. Riots broke out in several towns as people protested against high food prices. The crisis demonstrated that poverty was not caused by individual laziness - it could strike anyone when the harvest failed. This period was the worst subsistence crisis of the entire Elizabethan era.

📉 Causes of Poverty

1. Enclosure

2. Bad Harvests

3. Rising Population

4. Debasement of Coinage

5. Other Causes

Cause Details Impact
Enclosure Land fenced off for sheep farming; common land lost Rural poor driven off the land; migration to towns
Bad harvests Unreliable weather; no food storage systems Food prices soared; famine; riots
Rising population Population grew from 2.5m to 4m (1500-1600) Not enough jobs or resources
Debasement of coinage Henry VIII reduced silver in coins; caused inflation Prices tripled; wages barely doubled
Dissolution of monasteries Monasteries (the main source of charity) closed 1536-41 No organised charity for the poor

🤔 Attitudes to the Poor

The Deserving vs. Undeserving Poor

The Key Distinction: Elizabethan people divided the poor into two categories:
  • The "deserving poor": Those who were poor through no fault of their own - the old, the sick, the disabled, widows, orphans, and those temporarily unemployed due to harvest failure. These people deserved sympathy and help.
  • The "undeserving poor": Those who were believed to be poor through their own fault - the idle, the lazy, drunkards, and vagrants who chose not to work. These people deserved punishment, not help.
This distinction was central to all Elizabethan poor law legislation.

Why People Feared Vagrants

Example: Attitudes to Vagrants

Thomas Harman's "A Caveat for Common Cursitors" (1567) described the various types of vagrants in terrifying detail: "Upright Men" (vagrant leaders), "Abram Men" (feigning madness), "Whip Jacks" (pretending to be shipwrecked sailors), and "Dummerers" (pretending to be mute). Harman claimed that vagrants lived in a criminal underworld with its own language ("canting") and hierarchy. Such pamphlets reinforced the belief that vagrants were dangerous criminals, not desperate people in need of help.

Category Who They Were Public Attitude Treatment
Deserving poor The old, sick, disabled, widows, orphans Sympathy and charity Given help (food, money, shelter)
Undeserving poor / Vagrants The able-bodied who would not work Fear, anger, disgust Whipped, branded, imprisoned, executed

📜 Government Legislation on Poverty

The 1572 Vagabond Act

The Harshness of the 1572 Act: The 1572 Act was deliberately brutal because it treated vagrancy as a criminal problem, not a social one. Burning through the ear permanently marked a person as a vagrant, making it impossible for them to escape the stigma. The threat of execution for a third offence was extreme, though it was rarely carried out in practice. The Act reflected the fear and anger that vagrants inspired in the propertied classes.

The 1576 Poor Relief Act

The 1597 Act for the Relief of the Poor

The 1601 Poor Law (The Act for the Relief of the Poor)

The 1601 Poor Law Framework:
Parish = Basic unit of poor relief
Overseers = Appointed to organise and distribute relief
Poor Rate = Compulsory local tax on property owners
Deserving Poor = Given relief (food, clothing, money)
Able-bodied Poor = Set to work
Vagrants = Whipped and returned to home parish
This system lasted until the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act.
Act Year Key Provisions Significance
Vagabond Act 1572 Harsh punishments for vagrants (whipping, ear-burning, execution); first compulsory poor rate First national attempt to deal with poverty; extremely punitive
Poor Relief Act 1576 Required towns to provide work; established Houses of Correction Shifted from punishment to providing work
Act for Relief of the Poor 1597 Parish overseers appointed; poor rate collected and distributed Most comprehensive legislation yet; responded to 1590s crisis
Poor Law 1601 Consolidated all previous legislation; parish responsibility; compulsory poor rate Remained basis of English poor law for 230+ years

⛓️ Punishment of Vagrants

The punishment of vagrants was severe and deliberately public, designed to deter others from choosing a life of wandering.

Typical Punishments

How Effective Were the Punishments? The harsh punishments for vagrants were largely ineffective. Whipping and branding did not solve the underlying causes of poverty - vagrants returned to wandering because they had no alternative. The punishments were also difficult to enforce consistently: JPs were often reluctant to carry out extreme sentences; local communities sometimes sympathised with local vagrants; and the system of returning vagrants to their home parish was impractical. The fundamental problem was that legislation treated poverty as a moral failing rather than an economic problem.

📊 How Effective Was the Elizabethan Approach to Poverty?

Strengths: The Elizabethan poor laws created the first national system of poor relief in English history. The 1601 Poor Law remained the basis of the system for over 230 years. The distinction between deserving and undeserving poor ensured that the most vulnerable received some help. The compulsory poor rate provided a reliable source of funding. The parish system meant that relief was organised at a local level, making it more responsive to local needs.
Weaknesses: The system was inconsistent - each parish operated independently, leading to enormous variation in the quality and quantity of relief. The harsh treatment of vagrants did not address the causes of poverty. The parish system meant that the poor could not move to find work without losing their right to relief. The system was underfunded and overwhelmed during crisis years (like 1594-97). The distinction between deserving and undeserving was often arbitrary and cruel. The system stigmatised the poor and treated poverty as a personal moral failing.

❓ Practice Questions

Q1: Explain two causes of poverty in Elizabethan England. (4 marks)

Q2: What was the difference between the "deserving poor" and the "undeserving poor"? (4 marks)

Q3: Describe the punishments that could be given to vagrants under the 1572 Vagabond Act. (4 marks)

Q4: How did the Elizabethan government's approach to poverty change between 1572 and 1601? (8 marks)

Q5: "The Elizabethan government was more concerned with punishing vagrants than helping the poor." How far do you agree? (16 marks + 4 SPaG)

Q6: Explain why the 1601 Poor Law was significant. (4 marks)

✅ Answers

  1. Two causes: (1) Enclosure - landowners fenced off common land for sheep farming, depriving peasants of the land they needed for grazing and growing food, driving them off the land into towns; (2) Rising population - the population grew from 2.5 million to over 4 million between 1500 and 1600, creating more demand for food, housing, and jobs than the economy could supply. Other causes include bad harvests, debasement of coinage, and the dissolution of the monasteries.
  2. The "deserving poor" were those who were poor through no fault of their own - the old, sick, disabled, widows, and orphans - and were considered worthy of sympathy and help. The "undeserving poor" were the able-bodied who could work but chose not to - vagrants, beggars, and the idle - who were considered morally responsible for their poverty and deserving of punishment rather than help.
  3. Under the 1572 Act: first offence - public whipping and burning through the right ear with a hot iron; second offence - imprisonment or deportation; third offence - execution as a felon. Vagrants were also to be returned to their home parish. The punishments were deliberately harsh and public to deter others.
  4. The government's approach changed from primarily punitive to more constructive: the 1572 Act focused on harsh punishment of vagrants (whipping, ear-burning, execution); the 1576 Act shifted towards providing work for the able-bodied poor and establishing Houses of Correction; the 1597 Act appointed parish overseers and organised systematic relief; the 1601 Act consolidated all previous legislation, maintaining punishment for vagrants but also ensuring a comprehensive system of relief for the deserving poor. The overall trend was from punishment towards a more balanced approach combining punishment with relief.
  5. A balanced answer should discuss: the punitive approach (the 1572 Act's extreme punishments for vagrants - whipping, ear-burning, execution; the harsh treatment of the "undeserving poor"; the fact that punishments did not address the causes of poverty); the helpful approach (the poor rate providing funding for relief; the 1576 Act providing work; the 1601 Act creating a comprehensive system of parish relief for the deserving poor). Argue that the government was initially more concerned with punishment but gradually developed a more balanced approach - though the underlying assumption that poverty was a moral problem rather than an economic one remained throughout the period.
  6. The 1601 Poor Law was significant because: it consolidated all previous poor law legislation into a single comprehensive statute; it established the principle of parish responsibility for the poor; it created a compulsory poor rate funded by local property owners; it provided relief for the deserving poor, work for the able-bodied, and apprenticeships for poor children; it remained the basis of the English poor law system for over 230 years until the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act.

🎯 Exam Tips

📝 Exam Technique

History Exam Tips — The Problem of the Poor:
1. For The Problem of the Poor, include specific factual detail: dates, names, events and statistics where relevant
2. For source questions, analyse provenance (who, when, why, audience) before using the content
3. In evaluation questions, discuss multiple factors and weigh their relative significance
4. Always link back to the question focus — don't just narrate what happened with The Problem of the Poor
5. Use phrases like 'the most significant factor was... because...' to show analytical judgement

⚠️ Common Errors

Watch Out!

Students often think elizabeth solved the religious problem. Wrong: Elizabeth solved the religious problem Correct: The Religious Settlement was a compromise that satisfied neither Puritans nor Catholics. Catholic plots continued throughout her reign.

Students often think the spanish armada was defeated entirely by the english. Wrong: The Spanish Armada was defeated entirely by the English Correct: While English tactics (fire ships) were important, the weather played a crucial role. Many Spanish ships were wrecked by storms.

Students often think elizabethan england was a golden age for everyone. Wrong: Elizabethan England was a golden age for everyone Correct: While the elite prospered, many lived in poverty. Enclosure displaced peasants, harvests failed, and the Poor Laws were often harsh.

✍️ Model Answer

Full-Mark Response

12 marks: Explain why poverty increased in Elizabethan England.

Poverty increased in Elizabethan England because of a combination of economic, demographic, and agricultural factors. Enclosure was a major cause: landowners fenced off common land with hedges to keep sheep for the lucrative wool trade, depriving peasants of the land they had used for grazing and growing crops. Thomas More wrote in "Utopia" (1516): "Sheep that were wont to be so meek and tame... now become so great devourers... that they eat up and swallow down the very men themselves." Enclosure drove people off the land and into towns where they often could not find work.

Rising population was another significant cause. England's population grew from approximately 2.5 million in 1500 to over 4 million by 1600 — an increase of approximately 60%. More people meant more demand for food, housing, and jobs, but the economy could not keep up. Real wages fell by approximately 50% between 1500 and 1600 as prices rose faster than wages. The debasement of coinage by Henry VIII and Edward VI — reducing the silver content of coins to fund wars — caused severe inflation. Although Elizabeth restored the silver content in 1560-61, the damage was done: prices approximately tripled while wages barely doubled.

Bad harvests made poverty worse. The "Little Ice Age" made harvests increasingly unreliable. Terrible harvests from 1594 to 1597 caused the price of wheat to rise by approximately 90%, reducing the poor to eating dogs, cats, and grass, and causing riots in several towns. The dissolution of the monasteries (1536-41) had removed the main source of organised charity, leaving no replacement system until the government stepped in.

The government responded with increasingly comprehensive legislation. The 1572 Vagabond Act was harsh: first-offence vagrants were publicly whipped and burned through the right ear; a second offence meant imprisonment; a third could mean execution. However, the 1572 Act also introduced the first compulsory poor rate to support the deserving poor. The 1576 Poor Relief Act required towns to provide work for the able-bodied and established Houses of Correction. The 1601 Poor Law consolidated all previous legislation: each parish was responsible for its own poor, overseers raised a compulsory poor rate from property owners, the deserving poor received relief, the able-bodied were set to work, and vagrants were whipped and returned to their home parish. This system lasted over 230 years until the 1834 Poor Law Amendment Act. In conclusion, poverty increased because structural economic changes — enclosure, population growth, and inflation — pushed more people into destitution, while the dissolution of the monasteries removed the safety net. The government gradually moved from punishing vagrants to creating a systematic approach to poor relief.

📊 AO Deep Dive

Assessment Objective Analysis

AQA History tests three AOs: AO1 (Knowledge, 35%) requires recall of specific facts, dates and details about The Problem of the Poor; AO2 (Explanation, 35%) requires explaining causes, consequences and changes using detailed knowledge; AO3 (Sources and Interpretations, 30%) requires analysing provenance, content and usefulness of sources, and evaluating different historical interpretations. For grade 9, you need precise knowledge (specific dates, statistics and named individuals), sophisticated explanation showing how factors interrelate, and nuanced source analysis considering purpose, audience and context. The key difference between grade 5 and grade 9 is DETAIL and ANALYSIS — top answers support every point with specific evidence and reach substantiated conclusions.

📝 Exam Questions by Topic

🎬 Video Resources

Share this page

Ready to ace your GCSE History exams?

Get the best revision books and guides to boost your grades.