H1: Kaiser Wilhelm and Germany
The succession crisis after Edward the Confessor, four claimants, the battles of Fulford, Stamford Bridge and Hastings, and William's coronation — with Hastings tactics and the Bayeux Tapestry debate.
The succession crisis after Edward the Confessor, four claimants, the battles of Fulford, Stamford Bridge and Hastings, and William's coronation — with Hastings tactics and the Bayeux Tapestry debate.
The succession crisis: Edward the Confessor died childless (January 1066) with four claimants: William of Normandy (alleged 1051 promise + Godwinson oath of 1064), Harold Godwinson (chosen by the Witan, crowned immediately), Edgar Aetheling (blood claim, aged ~14), Harald Hardrada (Tostig’s alliance plus a deal with the Pope helped William gain support).
| Battle | Date | Opponent | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gate Fulford | 20 Sep 1066 | Tostig + Hardrada | Harold’s earls Edwin & Morcar defeated |
| Stamford Bridge | 25 Sep 1066 | Hardrada & Tostig | Both killed; Viking threat ended |
| Hastings | 14 Oct 1066 | William | Harold killed (arrow/blade to the eye per Bayeux Tapestry); William crowned Christmas Day 1066 |
Establishing control 1066–87: motte-and-bailey castles (3,000+, built in days), the Harrying of the North (1069–70) after the 1069 rising (Yorkshire devastated — Domesday records it "waste"), Submission of the earls (1075), and replacing the Anglo-Saxon aristocracy: by 1086 only two surviving major landholders were English.
Feudalism: the king owned all land; tenants-in-chief (barons/bishops, ~170) held it for knight service; knight’s fees (~4,000–5,000 knights owed ~40 days’ military service); peasants at the bottom. Sanctuary and salvage: introducing forests (royal hunting, harsh forest law) and the murdrum fine (a hundred paid 46 marks if a dead Norman was found with no killer produced — protecting the conquerors).
Domesday Book (1086): the great survey — who owned what, what it was worth under Edward and now; purposes: taxation, dispute settlement, control. "No Briton ever described England so thoroughly" — it legalised the conquest’s land grab by RECORDING it.
Village life: most were villeins (tied to the lord’s land, working ~2–3 days/week on demesne land); life revolved around the manor, harvest cycles and the village priest. Towns: growth of trade; Norman castles replaced Anglo-Saxon burhs; Jews invited over as moneylenders (Christians could not legally lend at interest).
Church: William replaced English bishops/abbots with Normans (by 1087 only Wulfstan of Worcester survived among senior figures); Lanfranc as Archbishop of Canterbury (1070) rebuilt discipline, raised cathedral schools, extended the hierarchy; monasticism flourished; Norman Romanesque architecture — massive cathedrals (Durham begun 1093) and castles as statements of power.
William Rufus (1087–1100) and Henry I (1100–35): succession struggles, Odo’s rebellion (1088), Malcolm III’s raids, Robert Curthose’s Normandy rivalry — Henry won Normandy at Tinchebray (1106); the Ango-Norman realm stabilised; Henry’s Coronation Charter (1100) promised to end Rufus’s abuses.
"The Harrying of the North was the main reason Norman control succeeded." How far do you agree? (AQA 16 + 4)
YES: the 1069–70 harrying destroyed the North’s ability to resist (Domesday shows "waste"; chroniclers record famine, even cannibalism reports); no northern rising after 1070. NO: castles garrisoned across the country were the daily instrument of control; land confiscation removed resistance leadership; Stamford Bridge had already destroyed the alternative dynasty. JUDGEMENT: the harrying finished the north specifically; castles + landholding held everything — argue "harrying was the bluntest, castles the constant, instrument".
Describe two features of the feudal system (4).
« All land was held from the king in exchange for military service — about 170 tenants-in-chief subinfeudated to ~4,000–5,000 knights. Second, obligations ran downward too: lords owed protection and land, vassals loyalty and service, binding society in a pyramid. »
Q1: Describe two features of the Battle of Hastings.
Q2: Give two reasons William built motte-and-bailey castles so rapidly.
Q3: Describe two features of the Harrying of the North.
Q4: What was the murdrum fine, and what does it reveal?
Q5: Explain why William commissioned the Domesday survey (two reasons, 4 marks).
Q6: "Castles were the most important way the Normans established control." How far do you agree? (16 + 4 marks)
This option is British-depth + historic environment (AQA: castle-focused). For the historic-environment question, know ONE castle in detail — e.g. Warkworth or Pleshey or Pevensey: building phases, defensive features (motte height, bailey functions, tower keeps), how design responded to the threat level. For interpretation questions the Bayeux Tapestry and Domesday entries are the default sources — practise "how useful" with purpose (propaganda/tax record) and missing context.
Spec 1HI0. Paper 1: Thematic study with historic environment. Paper 2: Period study + British depth study. Paper 3: Modern depth study. Three papers means three distinct revision plans — Edexcel's source/interpretation marks differ per paper, so practise each paper's question stems separately.
Always check: specification details change — confirm paper structure and set texts against the current specification for your exam year.
Get the best revision books and guides to boost your grades.