L23: Legal Problem Questions
How to apply legal rules to factual scenarios in problem questions
How to apply legal rules to factual scenarios in problem questions
How to apply legal rules to factual scenarios in problem questions
For Legal Problem Questions, you must know:
Q: What is the ILAC method and why is it useful?
Q: How should you approach a criminal law problem question?
Q: Why is it important to use the specific facts from the scenario?
Q: What language should you use when the legal outcome is uncertain?
Q: How do you handle a scenario with multiple legal issues?
✗ Stating the law without applying it to the scenario facts ✓ You must apply the law to the specific facts — for each legal rule, explain how it operates in the particular scenario you have been given
✗ Missing legal issues in the scenario ✓ Read the scenario carefully and identify every legal issue — there are usually multiple points to address, and missing one means losing marks
✗ Inventing facts that are not in the scenario ✓ Only use the facts given — do not add assumptions or new information. If a fact is unclear, acknowledge the ambiguity and explain how it might affect the outcome either way
✗ Giving a definite answer when the law is uncertain ✓ Use tentative language where the outcome could go either way — say 'the court would likely find' rather than 'the defendant is definitely guilty', and acknowledge counter-arguments
How should you apply the ILAC method to a criminal law scenario involving assault? (15 marks)
When applying ILAC to a criminal law assault scenario, begin by identifying the Issue: the question is whether the defendant is liable for assault (or battery, ABH, GBH depending on the scenario). Next, state the Law: define the offence precisely. For assault under the Criminal Justice Act 1988, the actus reus is an act which causes the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful violence, and the mens rea is intention or recklessness as to causing that apprehension. For battery, the actus reus is the application of unlawful force and the mens rea is intention or recklessness. Cite the relevant case law — for example, Fagan v MPC confirms that battery requires unlawful force, and R v Ireland establishes that psychiatric harm can amount to bodily harm. Then apply the law to the facts: use the specific details from the scenario. If the defendant raised their fist and moved towards the victim, explain that this constitutes the actus reus of assault because the victim would apprehend immediate unlawful violence. If the defendant claims they were joking, discuss whether the defendant had the mens rea — was it intentional or reckless? Apply R v Venna to explain that recklessness means the defendant was aware of the risk that their actions would cause apprehension. Then consider any defences: could self-defence apply? Use the scenario facts to assess whether the defendant genuinely believed they needed to defend themselves and whether the force used was reasonable (Palmer v R). Finally, reach a Conclusion: on the facts given, the defendant is likely/unlikely to be guilty because... Always acknowledge uncertainty where the facts support different interpretations.
AO1 (Knowledge & Understanding): Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of legal problem questions, including key legal rules, principles and concepts relevant to OCR J271.
AO2 (Application): Apply knowledge and understanding of legal problem questions to legal scenarios and problems, using legal reasoning and analysis.
AO3 (Analysis & Evaluation): Analyse, evaluate and critique legal rules, principles and reform proposals related to legal problem questions, constructing balanced and supported arguments.
Get the best revision books and guides to boost your grades.