MS17: Events & Issues Representation
How media represents events and social issues: agenda setting, framing, moral panics, and the role of media in shaping public understanding of major events.
How media represents events and social issues: agenda setting, framing, moral panics, and the role of media in shaping public understanding of major events.
How media represents events and social issues: agenda setting, framing, moral panics, and the role of media in shaping public understanding of major events.
For Events & Issues Representation, you must know:
Q: What is agenda setting and how does it work?
Q: Explain Stanley Cohen's concept of the moral panic.
Q: How does media framing affect audience understanding of events?
✗ The media simply reports events objectively. ✓ All media coverage involves construction — selection, framing, language choices, and image choices shape how events are represented. There is no such thing as purely objective reporting; all representation involves mediation.
✗ Moral panics are always about trivial concerns. ✓ Moral panics can arise from genuine social issues, but the media response amplifies the concern beyond proportion. The issue may be real; the panic is the disproportionate public reaction driven by media coverage.
✗ Audiences are easily manipulated by media framing. ✓ While framing influences understanding, audiences are not passive. Hall's reception theory shows audiences can negotiate or oppose the preferred reading. Active audiences may recognise and challenge biased framing.
Evaluate the role of media in constructing moral panics. [12 marks]
The media plays a central role in constructing moral panics by amplifying perceived threats to social values, often beyond their actual scale. Cohen's study of the mods and rockers showed how media exaggeration created a deviancy amplification spiral: sensational reporting made the groups seem more threatening, which led to more public concern, more policing, and more media coverage. The media didn't just report the events — it constructed a social problem. Moral panics follow a pattern: a group or behaviour is defined as deviant; the media exaggerates the scale and threat; moral entrepreneurs (politicians, experts) call for action; authorities respond with crackdowns; the panic subsides but the stereotype persists. Examples include video nasties in the 1980s, knife crime in the 2000s, and social media harms today. However, moral panic theory has limitations. Some threats are genuine — knife crime does kill people. Dismissing all public concern as moral panic can minimise real problems. The theory also assumes a passive audience, whereas Hall's reception theory suggests audiences may negotiate or resist the preferred reading. Social media has changed moral panics. Online, panics can escalate faster and spread further, but counter-narratives also emerge quickly. The gatekeeping function of traditional media is weakened. Overall, while moral panic theory remains valuable for understanding how media amplifies social anxieties, it must be applied critically — not all public concern is a moral panic, and audiences are more active than the theory suggests.
AO1 (Knowledge & Understanding): Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of events & issues representation, including key concepts, theories, and media contexts.
AO2 (Analysis & Evaluation): Analyse and evaluate events & issues representation using relevant theories and frameworks. Consider different perspectives and reach reasoned conclusions.
AO3 (Create): Apply understanding of events & issues representation to practical media production, demonstrating how theoretical knowledge informs creative decisions.
Get the best revision books and guides to boost your grades.