PS21: Addiction
Understanding addiction: physical and psychological dependence, biological explanations (dopamine reward pathway), psychological explanations (learning theory, cognitive), and treatments.
Understanding addiction: physical and psychological dependence, biological explanations (dopamine reward pathway), psychological explanations (learning theory, cognitive), and treatments.
Understanding addiction: physical and psychological dependence, biological explanations (dopamine reward pathway), psychological explanations (learning theory, cognitive), and treatments.
For Addiction, you must know:
Q1: Explain how the dopamine reward pathway contributes to addiction.
Q2: Compare biological and learning theory explanations of addiction.
Q3: Evaluate treatments for addiction, considering both biological and psychological approaches.
Students often make mistakes here. Wrong: Addiction is simply a lack of willpower - people could stop if they really wanted to. Correct: Neuroscience shows addiction involves fundamental changes to the brain's reward system. The dopamine pathway is altered so that natural rewards no longer provide pleasure, and the substance becomes necessary for normal functioning. Withdrawal causes severe physical and psychological symptoms. While willpower plays a role in recovery, describing addiction as merely a lack of willpower ignores the powerful biological and psychological mechanisms that maintain it.
Evaluate whether biological or learning theory provides a better explanation of addiction.
A grade 9 response will: describe biological explanation (dopamine pathway, tolerance, withdrawal, genetics); describe learning explanation (classical conditioning of cues, operant reinforcement); evaluate biological (strong neuroscience evidence but cannot explain why most people who try substances don't become addicted); evaluate learning (explains environmental triggers and maintenance but doesn't explain initial vulnerability); conclude: both are needed - biological factors create vulnerability (not everyone is equally susceptible), learning theory explains how addiction develops and is maintained in specific contexts. A diathesis-stress model combining both provides the most complete explanation.
AO1 — Knowledge: Demonstrate knowledge of Addiction including key definitions, research studies and psychological terminology.
AO2 — Application: Apply your understanding of Addiction to real-world scenarios and given contexts. Use research evidence to support your points.
AO3 — Analysis & Evaluation: Evaluate psychological theories and studies related to Addiction, considering methodological strengths and weaknesses, and reaching a balanced conclusion.
Addiction is a core topic in GCSE Psychology that requires understanding of key studies, theories and research methods. The AQA, OCR and Edexcel specifications all require you to know specific studies in detail, evaluate their methodology, and apply psychological concepts to real-life scenarios. When studying addiction, focus on: the aims, methods, results and conclusions of key studies; the strengths and weaknesses of the research methods used; and how psychological understanding of addiction applies to everyday life.
Key studies in this area typically use specific research methods such as experiments, observations, self-report (questionnaires and interviews), or correlational analysis. When evaluating studies, consider: reliability (can the study be replicated?); validity (does it measure what it claims to measure?); ethics (were participants protected from harm?); generalisability (can the findings be applied beyond the study sample?); and usefulness (does the research have practical applications?).
GCSE Psychology emphasises the application of psychological knowledge to real contexts. You must be able to explain how understanding of addiction can be used to improve people’s lives, influence policy, or solve practical problems.
When writing about a study related to addiction, use the AMRC format: Aim (what was the study trying to find out?), Method (how was it conducted — design, sample, procedure?), Results (what were the key findings?), Conclusions (what do the results mean?).
Evaluation is a crucial skill in GCSE Psychology. When evaluating studies related to addiction, use the GRAVE method: Generalisability (can the findings be applied to the wider population?), Reliability (are the results consistent if the study is repeated?), Applications (how can the findings be used in real life?), Validity (does the study measure what it claims to measure?), and Ethics (were participants treated ethically?).
Research methods commonly used in addiction research include: laboratory experiments (high control but low ecological validity), field experiments (more realistic but less control), natural experiments (no manipulation of variables), case studies (in-depth but not generalisable), questionnaires (large samples but social desirability bias), and observations (natural behaviour but ethical concerns). Each method has strengths and limitations that must be evaluated in context.
Ethical issues in addiction research include: informed consent (participants must agree to take part), debriefing (explaining the true purpose after the study), confidentiality (protecting participants’ identities), protection from harm (no physical or psychological damage), and right to withdraw (participants can leave at any time). The BPS Code of Conduct governs ethical standards in UK psychological research.
When evaluating Milgram’s obedience study, you might note: low generalisability (all male, American sample); high reliability (standardised procedure with 65% obedience rate); useful applications (understanding wartime atrocities); low ecological validity (artificial laboratory setting); and serious ethical concerns (deception, psychological distress).
GCSE Psychology requires you to apply psychological understanding of addiction to everyday situations. Consider how the theories and studies you have learned about explain real behaviour: How does addiction affect people in schools, workplaces, families and communities? What interventions or strategies could improve outcomes based on psychological evidence?
When applying addiction to real-life scenarios, use the following structure: identify the relevant psychological concept, explain how it applies to the scenario, support your explanation with evidence from a named study, and evaluate the strength of the application (are there limitations or alternative explanations?).
The most effective GCSE Psychology answers show a clear link between theory, evidence and application. Avoid vague statements like ‘psychology can help’ — instead, specify which psychological concept applies, which study supports it, and exactly how it could be used in the given scenario.
A strong application answer: ‘Understanding of addiction could help in schools by [specific application]. This is supported by [named study] which found that [specific finding]. This means that [specific practical recommendation]. However, a limitation is [specific weakness of applying this research].’
| Evaluation Criterion | What It Means | How to Assess It |
|---|---|---|
| Generalisability | Can findings apply beyond the sample? | Consider sample size, representativeness, culture |
| Reliability | Are results consistent if repeated? | Standardised procedures, replicability |
| Validity | Does it measure what it claims? | Ecological validity, construct validity |
| Ethics | Were participants protected? | Consent, debriefing, protection from harm |
| Applications | Is the research useful? | Practical implications, real-world relevance |
Q: Describe one study related to addiction and evaluate its methodology using the GRAVE method.
A: A key study in addiction investigated [aim] using [method] with [sample]. The results showed [key finding], leading to the conclusion that [interpretation]. Evaluation: Generalisability — limited by [sample issue]; Reliability — strengthened by [standardisation]; Applications — useful for [practical application]; Validity — limited by [validity concern]; Ethics — problematic because [ethical issue]. Overall, the study makes a valuable contribution but has limitations that should be considered when applying the findings.
Q: Explain how psychological understanding of addiction could be applied to improve a real-life situation.
A: Understanding of addiction can be applied to improve [specific situation]. Research by [named psychologist] found that [key finding], which suggests that [practical recommendation]. For example, in a school context, this understanding could lead to [specific intervention] which would benefit people by [specific improvement]. However, individual differences mean that not everyone will respond the same way, so a personalised approach may be needed.
Get the best revision books and guides to boost your grades.