SO26: Sociology & Social Policy
How sociology influences social policy: evidence-based policy, the relationship between research and government policy, and debates about value-free sociology.
How sociology influences social policy: evidence-based policy, the relationship between research and government policy, and debates about value-free sociology.
How sociology influences social policy: evidence-based policy, the relationship between research and government policy, and debates about value-free sociology.
For Sociology & Social Policy, you must know:
Q1: Explain how sociological research can influence social policy, giving examples.
Q2: Compare positivist and interpretivist views on sociology and social policy.
Q3: Evaluate whether sociology should aim to influence social policy or remain value-free.
Students often make mistakes here. Wrong: Sociological research always leads to better social policy because it provides objective evidence. Correct: While evidence can improve policy, barriers exist: political ideology overrides evidence; research may be contradictory; policies are constrained by economics and public opinion; researchers may be biased. Evidence-based policy is an ideal but policy is shaped by evidence, ideology, economics and public opinion.
Evaluate the view that sociology should aim to change society rather than just study it.
A grade 9 response will: present case for studying (objectivity, credibility); present case for changing (Marx; research improves lives; value-free is impossible); evaluate: studying and changing are not mutually exclusive - rigorous research IS social change; conclude: sociology's primary role is rigorous research, but sociologists should engage with policy and debate. The distinction is a false dichotomy.
AO1 — Knowledge: Show knowledge of Sociology & Social Policy using sociological terminology accurately. Identify key thinkers, concepts and theoretical perspectives.
AO2 — Application: Apply understanding of Sociology & Social Policy to contemporary social contexts and given scenarios. Use evidence to illustrate sociological points.
AO3 — Analysis & Evaluation: Evaluate sociological explanations of Sociology & Social Policy, comparing different theoretical perspectives and weighing the quality of evidence.
Social policy refers to the plans and actions of government and other organisations that aim to address social problems and improve welfare. Sociological research can influence social policy by identifying problems, explaining their causes and evaluating potential solutions. For example, the Black Report (1980) used sociological evidence to show that health inequalities in the UK were largely caused by social and economic factors rather than individual behaviour. It found that the death rate for men in social class V (unskilled manual) was nearly twice that of men in social class I (professional). The report recommended policies to reduce poverty, improve housing and increase access to healthcare. However, the Thatcher government largely ignored its findings, illustrating that political ideology often determines whether sociological evidence is acted upon.
Different sociological perspectives have different views on the role of social policy. Functionalists argue that social policy should maintain social order and integration — the welfare state supports the smooth running of society. Marxists argue that social policy serves the interests of capitalism, for example by providing just enough welfare to prevent revolution while keeping a low-paid workforce available. Feminists argue that social policy has historically been based on a male breadwinner model, disadvantaging women — for example, the UK pension system was designed for men with continuous employment records, penalising women who took career breaks for childcare. New Right thinkers argue that generous welfare benefits create dependency and undermine the traditional family, pointing to the rise in lone-parent families as evidence. The coalition government’s austerity programme (2010–2015) reflected New Right thinking, cutting benefits to ‘incentivise’ work.
The UK welfare state was established in 1945 based on the Beveridge Report, which identified five ‘giant evils’: Want, Disease, Ignorance, Squalor and Idleness. The welfare state provides social security benefits, the NHS, free education, public housing and employment services. Functionalists see the welfare state as essential for social cohesion, providing a safety net that prevents extreme poverty and maintains social stability. The NHS, for example, ensures that healthcare is available to all regardless of income, which functionalists argue benefits society by maintaining a healthy workforce. However, New Right critics argue that the welfare state creates a ‘dependency culture’ where people rely on benefits rather than finding work. They point to the growth in incapacity benefit claims from 0.7 million in 1979 to 2.5 million by 2003 as evidence.
Current debates about welfare focus on the balance between support and incentives. Universal Credit, introduced from 2013, consolidated six working-age benefits into a single payment designed to ‘make work pay’ by tapering benefits gradually as earnings rise. However, critics argue that the five-week wait for initial payment, sanctions regime and single monthly payment have pushed many claimants into hardship and food bank use. The Trussell Trust reported that food bank use tripled between 2015 and 2023, with many referrals coming from people whose benefits had been delayed or sanctioned. Feminist sociologists highlight that Universal Credit is paid to one household member (usually the man), reducing women’s financial independence and potentially increasing their vulnerability to domestic abuse.
Evaluating the effectiveness of social policy requires examining whether policies achieve their intended outcomes and whether they have unintended consequences. Sure Start, launched in 1999, was a flagship Labour policy based on sociological evidence that early intervention could reduce inequality. It provided children’s centres in deprived areas offering childcare, health services and parenting support. Evaluations found that Sure Start improved children’s social development and parenting skills in the most disadvantaged areas, but Conservative governments from 2010 cut funding by over 60%, closing more than 1,000 centres. Sociologists argue that this illustrates the political nature of social policy: evidence of effectiveness does not guarantee continued funding.
Education policy has been heavily influenced by sociological research, though not always in ways sociologists would endorse. Marketisation policies (league tables, academies, parental choice) were influenced by the New Right’s critique of comprehensive education as failing to raise standards. Sociologists such as Ball argued that marketisation increased inequality because middle-class parents used their cultural capital to navigate the system, securing places at the best schools for their children. Pupil Premium funding (introduced in 2011) gives schools extra money for each disadvantaged pupil, reflecting sociological evidence about the attainment gap. However, research by the EEF shows that many schools spend Pupil Premium on general school costs rather than targeted interventions for disadvantaged students, reducing its effectiveness.
| Perspective | View of Welfare State | Policy Recommendation | Key Criticism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functionalist | Essential for social cohesion | Maintain universal services | Ignores how welfare may reinforce inequality |
| Marxist | Serves capitalism’s interests | Radical redistribution of wealth | Overly deterministic, ignores reform successes |
| Feminist | Based on patriarchal assumptions | Gender-equal policies, individual payments | May overlook class as well as gender |
| New Right | Creates dependency culture | Reduce benefits, strengthen families | Blames the poor, ignores structural causes |
| Social Democratic | Reduces inequality, promotes opportunity | Invest in welfare, education, health | Expensive, may not address root causes |
| Postmodernist | No single ‘right’ policy | Local, diverse, flexible responses | Undermines case for universal welfare |
Q: Evaluate the view that sociological research has had little real influence on social policy in the UK.
Q: Explain how feminist sociologists have criticised the welfare state and suggest how social policy could better reflect women’s needs.
Get the best revision books and guides to boost your grades.