Energetics and Kinetics
A* revision for enthalpy changes, Hess's law, Born-Haber cycles, collision theory, Maxwell-Boltzmann, rate equations and the Arrhenius equation, with required practicals and exam questions for all boards.
A* revision for enthalpy changes, Hess's law, Born-Haber cycles, collision theory, Maxwell-Boltzmann, rate equations and the Arrhenius equation, with required practicals and exam questions for all boards.
Enthalpy change (ΔH) is the heat energy change at constant pressure. Exothermic reactions release heat to the surroundings (ΔH negative; products lower than reactants; temperature rises) — combustion, oxidation, neutralisation. Endothermic reactions absorb heat (ΔH positive; products higher; temperature falls) — thermal decomposition, dissolving some salts. Standard conditions for all standard enthalpies: 100 kPa, 298 K, and 1 mol dm⁻³ for solutions; ΔHf° of elements in their standard states is 0.
Definitions to memorise exactly (each says 'one mole'): enthalpy of formation — one mole of a compound forms from its elements in their standard states; enthalpy of combustion — one mole of a substance burns completely in oxygen, always exothermic; enthalpy of neutralisation — one mole of water forms from an acid and alkali, −57.1 kJ/mol for strong acid–strong base; enthalpy of atomisation — one mole of gaseous atoms forms from an element in its standard state, always endothermic.
Calorimetry (required practical: measuring enthalpy of combustion or neutralisation): q = mcΔT, where m is the mass of solution heated (assume density 1 g cm⁻³) and c is specific heat capacity (4.18 J g⁻¹ K⁻¹ for water). Convert to ΔH by dividing by moles: ΔH = −q/n (negative for exothermic). Sources of error for combustion: heat loss to surroundings and apparatus, incomplete combustion (soot), evaporation of fuel, heat capacity of the container not accounted for — all make the measured value less exothermic than data-book values. Improvements: lid, draught shields, flame close to can, or a bomb calorimeter.
Energy level diagrams: y-axis enthalpy, reactants left, products right; exothermic products lower, endothermic products higher. An energy profile additionally shows the activation energy hump and, with a catalyst, a lower hump via an alternative route (two smaller humps). ΔH is the difference in levels; Ea is the hump height from reactants. Label both correctly — confusing them is a classic lost mark.
Hess's law: the total enthalpy change for a reaction is independent of the route taken, because enthalpy is a state function. Two standard cycles are examined. (1) Formation cycle — used when combustion data are given: ΔHr = ΣΔHc(reactants) − ΣΔHc(products). Watch the direction: combustion arrows point away from the reactants/products down to common combustion products (CO₂ + H₂O). (2) Combustion-cycle alternative / formation-data cycle — when ΔHf° data are given: ΔHr = ΣΔHf°(products) − ΣΔHf°(reactants).
Worked example (from formation data): for C₂H₅OH(l) + 3O₂(g) → 2CO₂(g) + 3H₂O(l), given ΔHf°(C₂H₅OH) = −277, ΔHf°(CO₂) = −394, ΔHf°(H₂O) = −286 kJ/mol: ΔHc = [(2 × −394) + (3 × −286)] − [−277] = (−788 − 858) + 277 = −1369 kJ/mol. Method marks: correct cycle, correct direction, correct multiples, final value with sign and units.
Bond enthalpy method: ΔH = Σ(bonds broken) − Σ(bonds formed) — breaking bonds is endothermic, forming is exothermic. Example: H₂(g) + Cl₂(g) → 2HCl(g) with H–H = 436, Cl–Cl = 243, H–Cl = 431 kJ/mol: ΔH = (436 + 243) − (2 × 431) = −183 kJ/mol. Limitations (standard explain question): mean bond enthalpies are averages over many different compounds containing that bond, and apply strictly only to gaseous molecules, so they ignore the specific molecular environment — calculations from ΔHf° data are more accurate because they are measured for the exact substance under standard conditions. If any reactant or product is liquid/solid, you cannot use mean bond enthalpies without an extra atomisation step.
Lattice enthalpy of formation: the enthalpy change when one mole of solid ionic lattice forms from its gaseous ions under standard conditions — always exothermic (e.g. Na⁺(g) + Cl⁻(g) → NaCl(s), −787 kJ/mol). The lattice dissociation enthalpy is the reverse, always endothermic. It cannot be measured directly, so a Born-Haber cycle is used: ΔHf° = ΔHat(metal) + ΣIE(metal) + ΔHat(non-metal) + ΣEA(non-metal) + ΔHlatt. Each stage: atomise the metal (endothermic), ionise it (IEs endothermic, larger for each successive electron), atomise the non-metal, add electrons (first EA usually exothermic; second EA always endothermic — energy needed to force an electron onto an already negative ion), then form the lattice.
Worked example: calculate lattice enthalpy of NaCl given ΔHf°(NaCl) = −411, ΔHat(Na) = +107, ΔHat(Cl) = +122, IE₁(Na) = +496, EA₁(Cl) = −349 kJ/mol: −411 = 107 + 122 + 496 − 349 + ΔHlatt, so ΔHlatt = −411 − 376 = −787 kJ/mol. Sign discipline is everything — state whether the answer is formation (negative) or dissociation (positive) enthalpy.
Comparing lattice enthalpies: more exothermic when ions are smaller and more highly charged (MgO >> NaCl). A gap between the theoretical lattice enthalpy (calculated assuming a perfect ionic model) and the experimental Born-Haber value indicates covalent character caused by polarisation of the anion — larger, more highly charged anions (e.g. AgI) polarise more, showing the purely ionic model fails.
Enthalpy of solution: ΔHsol = −ΔHlatt(dissociation) + ΣΔHhyd — equivalently ΔHlatt(formation) + ΣΔHhyd. Hydration enthalpy is always exothermic and more exothermic for smaller, higher-charge ions (Li⁺ most exothermic in Group 1, decreasing down the group). Dissolving is feasible when ΔHsol is exothermic, or when TΔS outweighs an endothermic ΔHsol.
Gibbs free energy: ΔG = ΔH − TΔS (T in kelvin, ΔS converted to kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹). Reaction thermodynamically feasible when ΔG ≤ 0. Example: CaCO₃(s) → CaO(s) + CO₂(g), ΔH = +178 kJ/mol, ΔS = +161 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹: feasible when T ≥ ΔH/ΔS = 178000/161 = 1106 K (833 °C). Entropy increases on: melting, boiling (large), dissolving gases out of solution, more gas moles produced. Feasible ≠ spontaneous — rate and activation energy still matter (kinetic control).
Collision theory: reactions occur when molecules collide with at least the activation energy (Ea) and with correct orientation — only then is a collision effective. Factors increasing rate: concentration/pressure — more molecules per unit volume, more frequent collisions; temperature — molecules move faster, more frequent collisions and (much more importantly) a far higher proportion exceed Ea; surface area (solids) — more exposed particles; catalyst — alternative route with lower Ea.
The Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution shows the number of molecules with a given energy: starts at the origin (no molecules with zero energy), peaks at the most probable energy, and never touches the x-axis at high energy. When temperature rises, the peak shifts right and flattens — the total area (number of molecules) is unchanged, but the area beyond Ea increases disproportionately, giving an exponentially faster reaction. Drawing marks: label axes, draw the Ea line, shade/hatch the extra area beyond Ea at the higher temperature. With a catalyst, draw a lower Ea line — a much larger area of the unchanged distribution now exceeds it.
Required practical (rates): follow reaction rate by measuring gas volume (gas syringe), mass loss (balance) or colour change/turbidity (disappearing cross), then vary concentration or temperature while keeping everything else constant. Classic experiment: Mg + HCl, or Na₂S₂O₃ + HCl with the disappearing cross. Control variables, plot rate against concentration, repeat and average; state the main error sources (reaction starts before sealing/inserting, timing of the endpoint is subjective) and improvements (bung ready, data-logger, fixed cross distance).
Rate equations must be determined experimentally — orders cannot be deduced from the equation: rate = k[A]m[B]n; overall order = m + n. Zero order: rate independent of [A] (horizontal concentration–time graph). First order: rate ∝ [A]; concentration–time graph shows constant half-life — t½ = ln2/k; ln[A] = −kt + ln[A]₀ gives a straight line when ln[A] is plotted against t. Second order: rate ∝ [A]²; 1/[A] vs t is linear; half-life doubles as concentration halves.
Determining orders: the initial-rates method — vary one concentration while holding others constant and compare initial rates (e.g. from tangents at t = 0 or the disappearing-cross method). If doubling [A] doubles the rate, order 1 in A; quadruples, order 2; no change, order 0. Once orders are known, substitute concentrations and rates into the rate equation to calculate k with units: s⁻¹ for first order, mol⁻¹ dm³ s⁻¹ for second, mol⁻² dm⁶ s⁻¹ for third overall. Clock reactions approximate initial rate using the time for a fixed small amount of product to appear (rate ∝ 1/t).
The Arrhenius equation: k = Ae−Ea/RT. Rearranged: ln k = −Ea/RT + ln A, so plotting ln k against 1/T gives a straight line with gradient −Ea/R and intercept ln A. Exam calculations: given two rate constants at two temperatures, use ln(k₂/k₁) = −Ea/R × (1/T₂ − 1/T₁). A typical answer: Ea = R × gradient × (−1), with R = 8.31 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ and temperatures in kelvin. Increasing temperature raises k because a greater proportion of molecules exceed Ea — the exponential term is the key explanation.
Mechanisms and rate equations connect at A2: in a multi-step mechanism, the rate-determining (slowest) step controls the rate equation; species in the rate-determining step (and species feeding into it via fast pre-equilibrium) appear in the rate equation. If rate = k[(CH₃)₃CBr], the rate-determining step involves only the halogenoalkane — evidence for an SN1 mechanism (see Organic Chemistry: Mechanisms).