H1: Kaiser Wilhelm and Germany
The succession struggle, collectivisation and the 1932–33 famine, the Five-Year Plans, the Great Purge and the cult of personality.
The succession struggle, collectivisation and the 1932–33 famine, the Five-Year Plans, the Great Purge and the cult of personality.
Succession: Stalin’s party machine beat Trotsky (‘socialism in one country’ vs permanent revolution); Lenin’s Testament suppressed. Collectivisation (1929–33): kolkhozes, de-kulakisation, grain seized → famine 1932–33 (~5–7m dead). Five-Year Plans: Magnitogorsk, Dnieper dam, Stakhanovites; consumer goods sacrificed. Terror: Kirov murdered (1934) → Great Purge (1936–38): show trials (Zinoviev, Kamenev, Bukharin), ~750,000 executed, gulags, army officer corps beheaded. Cult of personality, Socialist Realism, Komsomol.
'Collectivisation failed.' How far do you agree? (16 + 4)
FAILED economically: output fell, famine killed millions, peasants slaughtered livestock. SUCCEEDED politically: state control of grain (exports funded industrialisation), the Party reached every village, kulaks eliminated as a class. Verdict: economic failure, political success.
Q1: Describe two features of collectivisation.
Q2: Give two features of the Five-Year Plans.
Q3: What were the show trials?
Q4: Explain why Stalin launched the Great Purge (two reasons, 4 marks).
Q5: 'The Five-Year Plans succeeded.' How far do you agree? (16 + 4)
Stalin essays hold the ‘transformation vs terror’ tension: plans succeeded industrially while living standards fell — top answers keep both facts.
Spec 8145. Paper 1: Understanding the modern world (one period study + one wider-world depth study). Paper 2: Shaping the nation (one thematic study with historic environment + one British depth study including the historic environment). AQA's AO4 historic-environment questions reward site-specific knowledge, not general period knowledge.
Always check: specification details change — confirm paper structure and set texts against the current specification for your exam year.
TRANSFORMED: second-largest industrial power; steel/oil/electricity tripled; the Dnieper dam and new industrial cities; no unemployment (the West’s Depression contrast); tractor/tank capacity that beat Hitler.
AT WHAT COST: collectivisation’s famine (5–7m); consumption collapsed; labour camps (Belomor Canal, ~25,000 deaths); falsified statistics; consumer goods catastrophic.
Judgement: define "transformed" — the economy changed beyond recognition; the PEOPLE paid the entire bill. Conclude: transformation and terror were the same policy — the plans were built on the famine and the camps.
The magnet mountain: a purpose-built steel city rising from 1929 — 25,000 arrivals a month, barracks and mud, foreign engineers (Ford built the car plant), Stakhanovite heroics, totalitarian planning. By 1934 Magnitka produced more steel than all Tsarist Russia. Living conditions: queues, lice, criminal chaos — then proper blocks for the elite. John Scott’s memoir (Behind the Urals) records the heroism AND the horror. Exam use: Magnitogorsk answers "did the plans succeed?" with industrial triumph + human cost in one place — the two-sided verdict in a single city.
Get the best revision books and guides to boost your grades.