R7: Synthesis
Combining information from multiple sources to create a coherent summary.
Combining information from multiple sources to create a coherent summary.
Synthesis involves:
Write a summary of the differences between the two writers' experiences.
You should use details from both sources.
Using details from both sources, write a summary of what you learn about...
| Purpose | Starters |
|---|---|
| Introducing similarities | Both texts suggest... / Similarly, both sources... / The texts agree that... |
| Introducing differences | While Source A... Source B... / In contrast... / The texts differ in that... |
| Combining information | Both sources indicate... / Together, these texts reveal... / The evidence from both suggests... |
Both texts describe experiences of childhood, but they present very different perspectives. Source A describes a carefree, happy childhood where the writer "ran wild through the fields" and felt "completely free." In contrast, Source B presents a more restricted experience, where the writer felt "trapped" by strict rules and describes a childhood of "constant supervision." While Source A's writer recalls "endless summers," Source B remembers feeling "watched constantly" and unable to escape adult scrutiny.
| Aspect | Synthesis | Comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | WHAT texts say | HOW texts convey meaning |
| Skills | Summary, combining | Analysis of methods |
| Language analysis | No - focus on content | Yes - analyse techniques |
| Quotations | Brief, for evidence | For analysis |
| Own words | Yes - preferred | Embedded quotes |
| Mistake | Correction |
|---|---|
| Analysing language devices | Focus on content - what each text says |
| Writing about only one text | Use evidence from BOTH sources |
| Copying large chunks of text | Summarise in your own words |
| Not addressing the question focus | Check you're answering what's asked |
| Listing points without synthesis | Combine information from both texts |
Q1: What is the main difference between synthesis and comparison?
Q2: Should you analyse language devices in a synthesis question?
Q3: How should you use quotations in synthesis?
Q4: What sentence starter would you use to show a difference between texts?
Time management: Q2 = 10 minutes for 8 marks. Keep it concise - two well-structured paragraphs that synthesise both texts are better than a long, rambling response.
What examiners look for: Clear synthesis (not separate descriptions), accurate summary of content from both texts, own words preferred, brief supporting quotations, and a direct response to the question focus (e.g. differences, similarities, or what you learn).
Students often analyse language devices in a synthesis question, treating it like a comparison question. Wrong: "Source A uses a simile to describe the school as 'a prison,' suggesting the writer feels trapped." Correct: "Source A presents school as a restrictive experience where students feel 'trapped,' while Source B describes it as a place of freedom where children 'explored and discovered.'"
Students often write about each text separately instead of synthesising. Wrong: One paragraph entirely about Source A, then one paragraph entirely about Source B. Correct: Combining information in each point: "Both sources describe school meals, but whereas Source A recalls 'delicious home-cooked food,' Source B describes 'bland, mass-produced dishes.'"
Students often copy large chunks of text instead of summarising in their own words. Wrong: Copying long sentences directly from the source. Correct: Paraphrasing the key information and using only short, embedded quotations as evidence.
8 marks: Use details from both sources to write a summary of the differences between the two writers' experiences of school.
The two writers present fundamentally different experiences of school. Source A describes a nurturing environment where the writer felt valued and inspired: the teachers are remembered as "kind" and "encouraging," and the writer speaks of "discovering a love of learning" that stayed with them. In contrast, Source B recalls a harsh, authoritarian school where fear dominated: the writer describes being "terrified of making mistakes" and feeling that school was "a daily ordeal." While Source A's writer remembers school as a place of intellectual growth, where lessons "opened doors" to new ideas, Source B's experience was one of suppression, where "questions were punished" and curiosity was actively discouraged. The difference extends to their social memories too: Source A describes "lifelong friendships" formed in the playground, whereas Source B remembers isolation, being "always alone at breaktime."
Mark scheme: Level 4 (7-8 marks) requires perceptive synthesis with relevant detail from both texts. Must combine information from both sources, use own words, include brief quotations, and directly address the question focus (differences).
AO1 for synthesis requires you to "identify and interpret explicit information and ideas" from multiple sources and combine them into a coherent summary. At grade 5, students identify relevant information from both texts but present it separately, or fail to make clear connections between what each text says. At grade 9, students weave both texts together seamlessly, making the synthesis feel organic rather than forced. They select the most relevant details, summarise precisely in their own words, and use comparative connectives naturally. The key difference is that grade 9 responses show the reader how the texts relate to each other, while grade 5 responses simply place information side by side without genuine synthesis.
Get the best revision books and guides to boost your grades.