A-Level Revision Aid: This resource is designed to support your revision. Content may contain errors. If you find a discrepancy with your class teaching, your teacher is correct — please let us know at alevelrevise@scott.scottrix.co.uk.
From Bismarck's fall to the fall of Berlin: Weltpolitik, Weimar's crises and Stresemann's diplomacy, the Nazi rise of 1929-33 and the Third Reich's terror, economy and racial policy, with Bullock, Kershaw and Evans, plus 30-mark essay logic for AQA, Edexcel and OCR.
🎯 Learning Objectives
Explain Bismarck's fall (1890) and the domestic and international dynamics of Weltpolitik to 1914 (AO1)
Analyse the Weimar constitution's structural weaknesses and the political impact of Versailles (AO1/AO2)
Assess the crises of 1919-23 and the extent of genuine stability under Stresemann, 1924-29 (AO2)
Evaluate the roles of the Depression, conservative elites and Hitler in the Nazi rise and consolidation, 1929-34 (AO1/AO2)
Assess the nature of the Third Reich: totalitarian control, the economy, Volksgemeinschaft and racial policy (AO1/AO2)
Deploy historiography (Bullock, Kershaw, Evans, Fischer, Wehler) as sustained argument in 30-mark essays (AO2)
📋 Key Definitions and Core Concepts
Weltpolitik: Wilhelm II's world-power foreign policy replacing Bismarck's continental caution: naval expansion (Tirpitz's Navy Laws 1898, 1900), colonial assertiveness (Morocco 1905, 1911) and the Anglo-German naval race.
Article 48: Weimar emergency provision allowing the president to rule by decree; intended as a safeguard, normalised under Brüning (1930-32) and the mechanism of presidential government that paved Hitler's way.
Enabling Act: Law to Remedy the Distress of People and Reich (23 March 1933): let the cabinet legislate without the Reichstag for four years; passed 444-94 with KPD deputies arrested and Centre obeying - the legal foundation of the dictatorship.
Gleichschaltung: 'Co-ordination' (1933): the Nazification of all institutions - Länder governments, trade unions (2 May), all parties banned (14 July), press, courts and culture.
Night of the Long Knives: Purge of 30 June 1934: Röhm's SA leadership and other targets (~85-200 killed, incl. Schleicher) murdered by the SS; bought the army's loyalty and preceded Hitler's merger of the presidency with the chancellorship (2 August 1934).
Volksgemeinschaft: 'People's community': the Nazi ideal of a racially unified national body transcending class, promoted through KdF (Strength through Joy), ritual and welfare, and defined by the exclusion of Jews and other 'alien' elements.
Kristallnacht: State-orchestrated pogrom of 9-10 November 1938 after vom Rath's murder: 91+ Jews killed, ~267 synagogues burned, 30,000 sent to camps, and a 1 billion Reichsmark fine imposed on Jewish communities.
Lebensraum: 'Living space': the commitment to eastward expansion for German settlement, realised in the war against the USSR (Barbarossa, June 1941; Generalplan Ost) and its accompanying genocides.
Wilhelmine Germany, 1871-1914: Bismarck's fall and Weltpolitik
Bismarck's fall (March 1890) came not from defeat but from imperial caprice: the 29-year-old Wilhelm II (reigned from 1888) demanded continuation of the Anti-Socialist Laws that Bismarck would not renew without full powers, and the chancellor resigned. His system passed to successors who dismantled it: Caprivi dropped the Reinsurance Treaty with Russia (1890), pushing St Petersburg towards the Franco-Russian alliance (1894). Weltpolitik replaced continental caution with global ambition: Tirpitz's Navy Laws (1898, 1900) built a battle fleet on the Risikotheorie - a fleet strong enough to menace Britain would deter attack; the Kruger telegram (1896) and the Morocco crises (1905 Tangier, 1911 Agadir, where the gunboat Panther appeared) dramatised the challenge that Britain answered with the Entente Cordiale (1904) and the Anglo-Russian convention (1907).
Domestically, Wilhelmine Germany stayed authoritarian: the chancellor answered to the Kaiser, not the Reichstag, yet the Reichstag controlled the budget and the SPD became the largest party in 1912 (110 seats, ~35% of the vote). The Daily Telegraph affair (1908) - Wilhelm's indiscreet interview claiming British fears of German navalism were mistaken - exposed the fragility of personal rule; the Zabern affair (1913), where the military defied a Reichstag censure, showed Prussian militarism overriding constitutional government. Historiography: the Fischer thesis (Griff nach der Weltmacht, 1961) held that expansionist elites deliberately risked war for world power; Wehler read Weltpolitik as Sammlungspolitik - foreign adventure deflecting social tension ('social imperialism'); later historians (Eley, Blackbourn) located continuities in German society beyond elite manipulation.
Examiners reward precise anchors: 1888 (the Dreikaiserjahr - three Kaisers in a year, ending with Wilhelm II), 1890 (Bismarck's dismissal), 1897 (Bülow and Tirpitz elevated - Weltpolitik institutionalised), 1908 (Daily Telegraph), 1912 (SPD largest party), 1913 (Zabern). The pattern to argue: domestic stagnation plus global assertiveness - a semi-authoritarian state whose elites used foreign policy to contain a rising SPD at home, yet whose navalism created the encirclement it feared.
The Weimar Republic, 1918-29: constitution, Versailles, crisis and stabilisation
The Weimar constitution (1919) was democratic on paper: universal suffrage (including women), proportional representation, a chancellor responsible to the Reichstag, and a popularly elected president with emergency powers under Article 48. But proportional representation fragmented the Reichstag - no party ever won a majority and governments lasted on average under a year - while Article 48, intended as a safety valve, normalised rule by decree after 1930. Versailles (28 June 1919) was received as a Diktat: Article 231 fixed war guilt; reparations were set at 132 billion gold marks (£6.6 billion, London Schedule 1921); Alsace-Lorraine was lost, the Polish Corridor cut East Prussia off, the army capped at 100,000. The stab-in-the-back myth fused with Versailles to poison legitimacy: the Spartacist rising (January 1919), the Kapp Putsch (March 1920) - 12,000 Freikorps briefly seized Berlin - and the assassinations of Erzberger (1921) and Rathenau (1922) showed a state whose army and judiciary were unreliably republican.
Hyperinflation: France and Belgium occupied the Ruhr (January 1923) after a reparations default; the government's passive resistance, paid for by printing money, collapsed the mark - by November 1923 one dollar bought 4.2 trillion marks, destroying savings and the middle class's faith in the Republic. Stresemann (chancellor August-November 1923, then foreign minister to his death in October 1929) stabilised: the Rentenmark ended the inflation, passive resistance was abandoned, and the Munich Putsch (8-9 November 1923) was crushed. Then Dawes Plan (1924) eased reparations with American loans; Locarno (1925) guaranteed the western borders; League entry followed (September 1926, Nobel Peace Prize with Briand); the Young Plan (1929) cut reparations to 2 billion marks a year. The Golden Twenties flowered culturally - Bauhaus modernism, expressionist cinema (Metropolis, The Blue Angel), a world capital of experiment - but Evans calls the stability superficial: prosperity was debt-financed, the elites hostile, and Peukert stresses the Republic's structural fragility beneath the façade.
Weimar also built: the National Assembly (elected January 1919) gave women the vote, and the Republic constructed a pioneering welfare state (unemployment insurance 1927, housing, the eight-hour day). Weigh this in essays on whether Weimar 'lacked support': it commanded working-class and liberal loyalty, an active associational culture, and 82% turnout in 1928 - the 'republic without republicans' thesis (Kershaw) needs qualifying with the DVP and Centre's pragmatism.
Weimar collapse and the Nazi rise, 1929-34
The Great Depression did what Weimar's enemies never could: American loans were recalled after the Wall Street Crash (October 1929), and unemployment rose from 1.4 million (1928) to over 6 million by early 1932. Brüning (chancellor 1930-32) answered with deflation - cuts imposed by decree under Article 48 - earning the name 'Hunger Chancellor'; presidential government hollowed out parliament. Nazi votes exploded: 2.6% (1928) to 18.3% (September 1930) to 37.3% (July 1932), the largest party - though falling to 33.1% in November 1932, proof that protest voting was not irreversible.
Election
NSDAP vote
Seats
May 1928
2.6%
12
September 1930
18.3%
107
July 1932
37.3%
230
November 1932
33.1%
196
March 1933
43.9%
288
Elites installed Hitler by miscalculation: Papen persuaded Hindenburg to appoint Hitler chancellor (30 January 1933) with conservatives holding most cabinet seats - 'we have hired him', and within two months 'we will have pushed him into a corner so hard he'll squeak'.
Consolidation: the Reichstag Fire (27 February 1933) produced the Decree for the Protection of People and State (28 February) suspending civil rights; the March election (43.9%) still fell short of a majority; the Enabling Act (23 March 1933, 444-94) allowed legislation without the Reichstag; Gleichschaltung followed - trade unions abolished (2 May), all other parties banned (14 July). The Night of the Long Knives (30 June 1934) - Röhm and the SA, ~85-200 killed, Schleicher among them - bought the army; Hindenburg's death (2 August) merged presidency and chancellorship, and soldiers swore the personal Hitler oath. Historiography:Kershaw stresses elite power-granting and mass 'self-encouragement' behind the Führer myth; Evans calls 1933 a legal counter-revolution ending Weimar's political culture; Bracher diagnosed a 'power revolution' enabled by constitutional weakness long before Hitler.
The Third Reich, 1933-45: totalitarian state, economy, Volksgemeinschaft, race and war
Power radiated from overlapping agencies competing for Hitler's favour: Himmler's SS (police, camps, from 1939 the Reich Main Security Office under Heydrich), the Gestapo and party Gauleiter. Propaganda (Goebbels: radio, the Nuremberg rallies, book-burnings May 1933, Gleichschaltung of culture) and the Hitler Youth and League of German Girls indoctrinated; the People's Court (1934) terrorised dissent, yet Gellately shows the regime ran substantially on willing denunciation. Volksgemeinschaft dissolved class conflict in ritual - Kraft durch Freude (Strength through Joy), the Volkswagen, Winter Relief - while women were pushed to Kinder, Küche, Kirche (marriage loans, birth prizes). The economy: Schacht financed recovery (deficit spending, Mefo bills, work creation - unemployment effectively zero by 1938-39), then the Four Year Plan (October 1936, Göring) pushed autarky and rearmament; Tooze (The Wages of Destruction) reads the economy as structurally committed to war yet never fully prepared for it.
Racial policy: the boycott (April 1933), exclusion from professions, the Nuremberg Laws (September 1935) - citizenship by blood and marriage bans - then Kristallnacht (9-10 November 1938): 91+ Jews killed, ~267 synagogues burned, 30,000 sent to camps, a 1 billion mark fine - state-orchestrated after vom Rath's murder and a decisive step from discrimination to violence. Sequence the foreign policy before the war: conscription and the Luftwaffe revealed (March 1935), Rhineland remilitarised (March 1936), Anschluss (March 1938), the Sudetenland via Munich (September 1938), Prague (March 1939) - each unilateral reversal of Versailles unopposed by force, persuading Hitler that Britain and France would never fight. War: Poland (September 1939), the fall of France (June 1940), then Operation Barbarossa (22 June 1941) turned conquest into annihilation - Einsatzgruppen mass shootings, starvation planning, and the Final Solution coordinated at Wannsee (January 1942): ~6 million Jews murdered, alongside Roma, Slavs and the disabled (the T4 programme). Total war under Speer (from 1942) prolonged resistance; Stalingrad (February 1943), the Stauffenberg bomb plot (20 July 1944) and converging invasion from east and west ended the Reich - Hitler's suicide (30 April 1945) and capitulation on 8 May. Historiography:Bullock cast Hitler as the opportunist 'dictator of genius' who exploited the weaknesses of others; Kershaw synthesises intentionalist and structuralist readings in 'working towards the Führer' - subordinates radicalising policy in anticipation of his will; Evans stresses cumulative radicalisation driven through war.
💡 Worked Example
Exam-style: 'The Enabling Act was the most important reason for the establishment of Hitler's dictatorship by 1934.' How far do you agree? [30 marks]
Mark-scheme logic: 30-mark argument logic: sustained line with supported judgement, not narrative. FOR the Enabling Act: 23 March 1933 (444-94) legalised rule without the Reichstag for four years - the platform for Gleichschaltung (unions 2 May, all parties banned 14 July) and the whole one-party state; without it, Hitler governed as head of a coalition. OTHER factors to weigh: the Reichstag Fire Decree (28 February 1933) suspended civil liberties first - arguably the operative instrument of terror (Dachau opened March 1933; KPD/SPD deputies arrested); elite sanction - Papen's 'we have hired him' appointment (30 January 1933) was the precondition without which no Act could be passed; mass support - 43.9% in March 1933, propaganda and SA intimidation (still short of a majority, so the Act needed the Centre's votes); completion in 1934 - the Night of the Long Knives (30 June) won the army, and Hindenburg's death (2 August) with the personal oath created the Führer state. Judgement: the Act was the legal keystone but not self-sufficient - it worked only with the February Decree's terror and elite permission, and the dictatorship was complete only by August 1934. A* requires a hierarchy of causes and historians deployed as argument (Kershaw: elite miscalculation and the Führer myth; Evans: legal counter-revolution; Bracher: constitutional weakness predating Hitler). Source questions (AQA/Edexcel): judge utility by NATURE, ORIGIN and PURPOSE, then test against context.
❓ Practice Questions & Mark Schemes
'Weltpolitik was the main cause of Germany's international isolation by 1914.' How far do you agree? [30 marks]
Answer: FOR: Tirpitz's Navy Laws (1898, 1900) and the risk theory provoked the Anglo-German naval race; Morocco (Tangier 1905, Agadir 1911) united Britain and France (Entente Cordiale 1904, Anglo-Russian convention 1907); the Kruger telegram (1896) and Bagdad railway signalled global challenge. AGAINST: Bismarck's fall - Caprivi's abandonment of the Reinsurance Treaty (1890) drove Russia to France (1894) before Weltpolitik matured; Wilhelm II's personal diplomacy (Daily Telegraph 1908) alienated rather than strategy alone; the security dilemmas of others - French revanche, resolved Anglo-Russian colonial rivalry. Judgement: Weltpolitik was central but worked through personality and miscalculation; A* weighs Fischer's <em>Griff nach der Weltmacht</em> against Wehler's 'social imperialism' and Eley/Blackbourn's social continuities - isolation was cumulative, Weltpolitik its accelerator.
'Hyperinflation (1923) posed the greatest threat to the Weimar Republic in its early years.' How far do you agree? [30 marks]
Answer: FOR: the Ruhr occupation (January 1923) and passive resistance produced 4.2 trillion marks to the dollar by November 1923; savings and the middle class's loyalty were destroyed; the Munich Putsch (8-9 November 1923) and Rhineland separatism rode the chaos. AGAINST: Versailles undermined legitimacy from birth (Diktat, Article 231, 132 billion gold marks, 100,000-man army); political violence 1919-22 (Spartacists 1919, Kapp 1920, Rathenau 1922) showed the army and judiciary unreliably republican; hyperinflation was solved in months (Rentenmark, Dawes 1924) while Versailles grievances persisted to 1933. Judgement: existential in 1923 but short-lived; the deeper, durable threats were Versailles and anti-democratic elites - Peukert's structural fragility and Evans's 'superficial' stability.
How useful are Stresemann's private letters and a Nazi Party election poster from 1932 for a historian studying German attitudes to the Weimar Republic? [20 marks]
Answer: NATURE: private correspondence versus mass propaganda - each proves a different attitude. ORIGIN: Stresemann writes as foreign minister for a trusted reader, candid about elite pragmatism - monarchist sympathies and the Republic as the lesser evil; the 1932 poster speaks for a mass movement's manufactured appeal (anti-Versailles, unemployment, 'Hitler über Deutschland'). PURPOSE: private letters inform and confess, so distortion is lower; the poster mobilises - emotional, not evidential, so it overstates Nazi certainty of victory. Utility: neither is 'reliable', both are useful - the letters reveal elite attitudes, the poster popular resentment; but neither is representative alone (NSDAP polled 37.3% in July 1932, so most Germans did not vote Nazi); corroboration with election results, press and memoirs tests each. A* concludes a partial source can still be highly useful for its specific attitude.
'The Great Depression was the main reason for the Nazi rise to power, 1929-33.' How far do you agree? [30 marks]
Answer: FOR: unemployment rose from 1.4 million (1928) to over 6 million (1932); Nazi votes jumped 2.6% (1928) to 18.3% (1930) to 37.3% (July 1932); Brüning's deflation ('Hunger Chancellor') and rule by Article 48 destroyed faith in parliamentary democracy. AGAINST: organisation - the Nazi machine (Goebbels's propaganda, 'Hitler über Deutschland' flights, the SA) converted despair into votes; constitutional weakness - PR fragmentation and Article 48 predated 1929; elite miscalculation - Papen and Hindenburg's appointment of Hitler (30 January 1933) without which Depression-era votes availed nothing; the NSDAP's fall to 33.1% (November 1932) shows Depression votes were not irreversible. Judgement: the Depression opened the window, but elite decision and Nazi organisation walked through it - Kershaw: 'power was granted' by elites; Evans: a counter-revolution completed by the February 1933 Decree.
'The Nazi economy was, by 1939, already prepared for war.' How far do you agree? [30 marks]
Answer: FOR: the Four Year Plan (October 1936, Göring) demanded autarky - synthetic fuel and rubber - and rearmament supremacy; unemployment was effectively zero by 1938 through Schacht's deficit financing (Mefo bills, work creation); conscription (March 1935), the Luftwaffe (revealed 1935) and Rhineland remilitarisation (March 1936) showed military intent; Tooze (<em>The Wages of Destruction</em>) reads the economy as structurally committed to conquest. AGAINST: unprepared in depth - foreign exchange crises (1934, 1939), chronic oil and steel shortfalls; the navy's Z-Plan fleet was unfinished; Blitzkrieg was in part an improvised answer to economic limits rather than a doctrine; Lebensraum itself assumed war would solve shortages. Judgement: the economy was directed at war but not equipped for a long one - A* sets Tooze's structural reading against older 'prepared by 1939' orthodoxy, and notes rearmament outran resources, forcing the timing of war itself.
amazon.co.uk
