A-Level Revision Aid: This resource is designed to support your revision. Content may contain errors. If you find a discrepancy with your class teaching, your teacher is correct — please let us know at alevelrevise@scott.scottrix.co.uk.
Henry VII's consolidation to the Armada: Bosworth, the break with Rome, the mid-Tudor crisis and Elizabeth's settlement, with Elton, Duffy and revisionist debates, plus 30-mark essay and source technique for AQA, Edexcel and OCR.
🎯 Learning Objectives
Explain Henry VII's consolidation: legitimacy, the Yorkist marriage, pretenders, financial control (AO1)
Analyse the break with Rome and the roles of Wolsey, Cromwell and parliament (AO1/AO2)
Assess the mid-Tudor crisis: Edwardian radicalism, Marian restoration, rebellion (AO2)
Evaluate the Elizabethan settlement and the Puritan, Catholic and Spanish threats (AO1/AO2)
Construct 30-mark causation essays and source analyses via nature, origin, purpose (AO3)
📋 Key Definitions and Core Concepts
Bonds and recognisances: Written obligations: a bond bound a subject to pay on breach (e.g. of good behaviour), a recognisance acknowledged the debt; enforced by the Council Learned.
Council Learned in the Law: Henry VII's financial council (Bray, then Empson and Dudley) enforcing bonds outside common law; unpopularity measured by their execution in 1510.
Reformation Parliament: Parliament 1529-36 legislating the break with Rome: Appeals Act 1533 ('this realm of England is an empire'), Supremacy 1534, Treasons Act 1534.
Act of Supremacy: 1534: king 'Supreme Head of the Church of England'. 1559: Elizabeth 'Supreme Governor' - softened for a female monarch and Catholic consciences.
Dissolution of the monasteries: Closure of houses under £200 income (1536) then the rest (1539): ~800 houses, land worth ~£132,000 a year to the crown and gentry.
Pilgrimage of Grace: Northern rising (Oct 1536-Jan 1537): Robert Aske, 30,000-40,000 pilgrims, 24 Pontefract Articles; pardon, then ~200 executions after Bigod's renewal.
Devise for the succession: Northumberland's 1553 scheme to crown Lady Jane Grey; failed after nine days when Mary's support rallied.
Marian burnings: 280-290 Protestants executed 1555-58 (Latimer and Ridley 1555, Cranmer 1556); Foxe's Acts and Monuments (1563) fixed 'Bloody Mary' in memory.
Elizabethan religious settlement: 1559: Act of Supremacy (Supreme Governor) + Act of Uniformity (Prayer Book, deliberately ambiguous communion wording), plus Injunctions and the Thirty-Nine Articles (1563/71).
Revolution in government: Elton's thesis: Cromwell replaced household government with national, statute-based administration, making king-in-parliament sovereign; revisionists (Ives, Starkey) contest it.
Henry VII: consolidation of power, 1485-1509
Bosworth (22 August 1485) gave Henry Tudor the crown by victory rather than blood: his claim ran through Margaret Beaufort's Lancastrian line and was barred by attainder, so consolidation mattered more than the battle. Henry backdated his reign to 21 August, attainting Richard's supporters as traitors, married Elizabeth of York (January 1486) and crowned her only after Arthur's birth (September 1486) - the union symbolised by the Tudor rose. Lambert Simnel, impersonating the Earl of Warwick, was crowned 'Edward VI' in Dublin and defeated at Stoke (June 1487) - 'the last battle of the Wars of the Roses'. Perkin Warbeck (1491-99), posing as Richard, Duke of York, won Burgundian, Imperial and Scottish backing (James IV married Catherine Gordon) and landed in Cornwall (1497); his execution alongside Warwick (1499) closed the Yorkist male line.
Henry disciplined a nobility whose independence had produced the civil wars: attainders (138 passed, 46 later reversed) controlled access to property; bonds and recognisances - enforced through the Council Learned in the Law under Bray, then Empson and Dudley - extracted over £300,000 and bypassed common law, making magnates financially hostage to good behaviour. Trade policy reinforced security: an embargo on Burgundian trade (1493-96) punished Warbeck's refuge, and the Magnus Intercursus (1496) restored it, while Navigation Acts (1485, 1489) built the merchant fleet. Historiography: older 'new monarchy' views (Pollard) stressed modernisation; Elton judged Henry restorative rather than innovative - a king who curbed disorder, but whose methods bred the resentment that made his son's early years popular.
Henry VIII, Wolsey and Cromwell, 1509-47
Wolsey (lord chancellor 1515, legate a latere 1518) pursued European glory: the Treaty of London (1518) promised universal peace, and the Field of Cloth of Gold (June 1520) - a summit with Francis I that cost a fortune and yielded no lasting gain. The Amicable Grant (1525), a forced loan for war with France, was abandoned after near-revolt and blamed on Wolsey. The King's Great Matter (annulment of the Catherine of Aragon marriage) collided with Pope Clement VII's captivity after the Sack of Rome (1527) - Catherine's nephew was Charles V.
Under Cromwell, the Reformation Parliament (1529-36) legislated England independent of Rome: the Appeals Act (1533) declared 'this realm of England is an empire'; the Act of Supremacy (1534) made the king 'Supreme Head'; the Treasons Act (1534) made words treason (Fisher and More executed 1535). As vicegerent in spirituals (1535), Cromwell drove the dissolution of the monasteries: smaller houses under £200 income (1536), the remainder (1539) - around 800 houses, land worth some £132,000 a year, much sold to the gentry, embedding reform in property and loyalty. Henry's own conservatism surfaced in the Six Articles (1539) reaffirming transubstantiation.
The Pilgrimage of Grace (October 1536-January 1537) answered: 30,000-40,000 pilgrims under lawyer Robert Aske, marching under the Five Wounds banner with the 24 Pontefract Articles (monasteries, Cromwell and Cranmer as 'heretics', the Statute of Uses, taxation). Norfolk bought time with a pardon; Bigod's renewal (1537) brought some 200 executions, Aske among them.
Historiography:Elton's 'revolution in government' credited Cromwell with replacing household government by national, statute-based administration - the king-in-parliament as sovereign. Revisionists (Ives on faction and patronage; Starkey) see exaggeration. Duffy's The Stripping of the Altars (1992) argued late-medieval Catholicism was healthy, so reform was imposed from above on a reluctant people.
Edward VI and Mary I, 1547-58
Somerset (Lord Protector 1547-49) governed through proclamations; economic crisis produced simultaneous risings in 1549 - Kett (Norfolk, enclosure) and the Western rebellion (Devon and Cornwall, Prayer Book and prices) - and his fall. Northumberland pushed evangelicalism (1552 Prayer Book, Forty-Two Articles), then attempted the Devise (1553) to crown Lady Jane Grey - the 'nine days queen'; Mary's support and his execution ended the scheme.
Mary I (1553-58) restored Rome: the Spanish marriage to Philip II provoked Wyatt's rebellion (January 1554, Kent) - marriage, not religion, was its declared cause; Jane Grey's execution followed. Cardinal Pole's absolution (1554) returned England to papal obedience; the First Statute of Repeal (1554) undid Edwardian legislation while leaving ex-monastic land sales intact - the gentry's gains were safe. Pole's legatine synod (1555-56) rebuilt clerical training. Roughly 280-290 Protestants were burned (1555-58) - Latimer and Ridley (1555), Cranmer (1556) - concentrated in London and the south-east, and fixed in memory as 'Bloody Mary' by Foxe's Acts and Monuments (1563). About 800 Marian exiles (Frankfurt, Geneva, Strasbourg) returned to shape the Elizabethan church and Puritanism.
Judgement: the restoration was legal but shallow - only three years, no senior clerical recruits to replace deprived bishops, and Foxe's print propaganda working against it. Yet revisionists (Duffy, Loades) note the Marian church's vitality: the burnings were taking effect, and Catholicism fell with Mary's death and the 1559 settlement, not before it.
Elizabeth I: settlement, threats and the Armada
The 1559 settlement was deliberately ambiguous: the Act of Supremacy made Elizabeth 'Supreme Governor'; the Act of Uniformity restored a revised Prayer Book with communion wording vague on the real presence; the Royal Injunctions (1559) and Thirty-Nine Articles (1563, statutory 1571) completed the frame. Puritan pressure followed: the vestarian controversy (1565-66, against Parker's Advertisements), Field and Wilcox's Admonition to Parliament (1572) demanding a Presbyterian structure, separatists (Browne, Barrow), Grindal's suspension (1577) over prophesyings, Whitgift's Three Articles and the High Commission (1583), and the Marprelate tracts (1588-89). Historiography: Neale's 'Puritan choir' saw organised parliamentary opposition; Elton and Collinson downsized it - Puritanism as mainstream within the church, not against it.
Mary, Queen of Scots (in England from 1568 after Darnley's murder and her abdication, held for 19 years) was the Catholic focus: the Northern Earls' rebellion (1569), the papal bull Regnans in Excelsis (1570) excommunicating Elizabeth, mission priests (Douai from 1574; Jesuits Campion and Parsons from 1580), then the Ridolfi (1571), Throckmorton (1583) and Babington (1586) plots. The Bond of Association (1584) made any plot for Mary's benefit treason; Walsingham's intelligence produced the Babington letters, and Elizabeth reluctantly signed Mary's death warrant (February 1587, Fotheringhay).
Spain compounded religion with strategy: Drake's privateering (Cartagena 1586, Cadiz 1587 - 'singeing the king's beard'), the Treaty of Nonsuch (1585) committing England to the Dutch rebels. The Armada (1588) failed through English gunnery (longer-range culverins), the Calais fireships, Gravelines, the Dutch blockade of Parma's barges and the weather; the defeat medal's God blew and they were scattered fused providence and propaganda. Mattingly read the Armada as an epic duel; Parker and Martin emphasise logistics, gunnery and Spanish command failure.
Historiography to carry through: Elton's Cromwellian revolution against revisionists (Ives, Starkey) on faction; Duffy's revisionism on popular Catholicism and Mary's church; Neale against Elton and Collinson on Puritanism. For A*, deploy them as argument - e.g. the dissolution as policy success (Elton) or an elite land-grab against a reluctant England (Duffy).
💡 Worked Example
Exam-style: 'The dissolution of the monasteries was the main reason for the Pilgrimage of Grace of 1536.' How far do you agree? [30 marks]
Mark-scheme logic: 30-mark causation logic: sustained argument with supported judgement, not narrative. FOR the dissolution: the direct trigger - Lincolnshire rising within weeks of commissioners arriving (1536); the 1536 Act closing smaller houses; pilgrims' fear that parish property would follow (Pontefract Articles opened with monasteries). OTHER causes to weigh: economic - bad harvests 1535-36, the 1534 subsidy, the Amicable Grant's memory, the Statute of Uses hitting gentry conveyancing; political-religious - the Treasons Act (1534) and the Pontefract demand to punish Cromwell and Cranmer as 'heretics'; coordination - gentry leadership (Aske, Darcy, Hussey) turning local riots into a 'pilgrimage'. Judgement: dissolution was the necessary trigger uniting commons and gentry, but the rising was multi-causal - A* needs a hierarchy showing the Act politicised economic and religious resentment. Source questions (Edexcel/AQA): judge utility by NATURE (royal letter, pilgrim oath, proclamation), ORIGIN (author's position - Norfolk minimises grievances, Aske justifies the pilgrimage) and PURPOSE (persuade, justify, inform), then test against context and corroboration; a partial source can still be highly useful for attitudes.
❓ Practice Questions & Mark Schemes
'Henry VII's marriage to Elizabeth of York was the most important reason for the security of his rule by 1509.' How far do you agree? [30 marks]
Answer: FOR: it united the Yorkist claim (Arthur born September 1486, Tudor rose), legitimised a Beaufort claim barred by attainder, and detached Yorkist magnates from pretenders. AGAINST: force decided the real tests - Stoke (1487) crushed Simnel; Warbeck's backing (Burgundy, Maximilian, James IV) never produced victory; finance made the nobility hostage (bonds and recognisances via the Council Learned, over £300,000; 138 attainders); trade (Magnus Intercursus 1496) removed foreign sponsorship of rebels. Judgement: the marriage was necessary but not sufficient - security rested on legitimacy interacting with force and financial control; the pretenders show legitimacy alone was not enough.
'Cromwell, not Henry VIII, was the driving force behind the English Reformation.' How far do you agree? [30 marks]
Answer: FOR: Cromwell drafted the Appeals Act preamble ('this realm of England is an empire'), ran the Reformation Parliament (1529-36), exercised supremacy as vicegerent in spirituals (1535) and drove the dissolution; Elton's 'revolution in government' makes him the architect of statute-based royal supremacy. AGAINST: the Great Matter was Henry's personal initiative; Henry's conservatism (Six Articles 1539) checked the evangelicals and destroyed Cromwell (1540); Ives and Starkey credit faction and the king's will over administrative genius. Judgement: Cromwell was the instrument and manager, Henry set the destination - Elton's thesis is best confined to method (parliament, bureaucracy), not motive.
How useful are a royal letter from Norfolk and a pilgrim's oath to a historian studying the causes of the Pilgrimage of Grace? [20 marks]
Answer: NATURE: private correspondence versus a collective oath - each proves a different attitude. ORIGIN: Norfolk writes as the king's lieutenant seeking pardon terms, so he minimises grievances and stresses obedience; the oath, taken by thousands, shows the movement's self-image ('pilgrims' not rebels', Five Wounds banner). PURPOSE: Norfolk's letter persuades Henry to accept terms, so diplomacy shapes its content; the oath legitimises the rising, so it exaggerates religious motive where commons' grievances may be economic. Utility: neither is 'reliable', both are useful - the letter reveals government perceptions of threat, the oath the ideology gentry leadership (Aske) imposed; corroboration with the Pontefract Articles tests each.
'The Marian burnings strengthened rather than weakened Catholicism in England.' How far do you agree? [30 marks]
Answer: FOR: revisionists (Duffy, Loades) argue the restored church was vital and the burnings took effect - few burnt after 1557, exiles demoralised, Pole's legatine synod (1555-56) rebuilt clergy training; the First Statute of Repeal (1554) left monastic land safe, easing gentry fears. AGAINST: 280-290 executions including bishops (Latimer, Ridley 1555; Cranmer 1556) shocked opinion; Foxe's Acts and Monuments (1563) printed the martyrs into Protestant memory ('Bloody Mary'); the burnings were county-specific, not national, and tied Catholicism to Spanish-aligned coercion (Wyatt 1554). Judgement: short term arguably strengthened (Duffy); but Mary's death in 1558 before the policy matured, and Foxe's print culture, converted it into long-term self-defeat.
'Religion was the main cause of the Spanish Armada.' How far do you agree? [30 marks]
Answer: FOR: the Counter-Reformation frame - Regnans in Excelsis (1570) made Elizabeth an excommunicate Philip could lawfully replace; the execution of Mary Queen of Scots (1587) removed the last Catholic claimant and finally released Philip; papal blessing and funds accompanied the enterprise. AGAINST: strategy and commerce - Drake's privateering (Cartagena 1586, Cadiz 1587) hit Philip's treasure and prestige; the Treaty of Nonsuch (1585) committed English troops to the Dutch revolt, threatening Spanish recovery of the Netherlands; the Armada's plan (join Parma) was a Netherlands problem, not an English one. Judgement: religion and strategy were fused - crusading rhetoric served a geopolitical aim; the execution of MQS (religious) and Nonsuch (strategic) together made war inevitable by 1587-88.
amazon.co.uk
